Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

Please point to the place where it says that it would allow a home buyer to get into a home for less money. The way I read it, the new buyer would pay the whole amount, and then pay 1% more when he sells the property, and it would go to the builder. Otherwise, the builder would get LESS money until the home is re-sold. If I misread something, please show me just where it was printed.

Note: I am not a lawyer, nor is any member of my family a lawyer, but I strongly urge people to be represented by a lawyer who specializes in real estate practice BEFORE they sign anything on a home purchase, even the orignial offer which usually merely includes a small amount of money to “hold” the sale until final papers are signed.


33 posted on 03/30/2010 8:53:15 AM PDT by kitkat (Obama hates us. Well, maybe a LOT of Kenyans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: kitkat

The article did not specifically mention the sales price might be reduced as an incentive to accept this 1% fee. But to me, this makes sense as a marketing ploy.

If I were a greedy developer seeking to prey on unsuspecting dummies, I’d emphasize how I’m lowering the sales price!

(Only to make a 1% profit years later when they sell the home.)


35 posted on 03/30/2010 9:01:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson