[Venturer]

Wait until the Obma care bills come due.

Certainly all of those getting a benefit will always be for the healthcare bil, but one day in the future the do-good ignoramous’s that voted for this thing will get the bill.

[highlander_UW]

I can see the rationale that in order to overturn Obamacare the republicans need every seat they can get, including those of the no vote democrats. if that turns out to be the case the no democrats have no one to blame but Obama and the democrats for pushing through an unconstitutional law that turns all Americans into slaves.

[SmokingJoe]

Her lackluster numbers can be linked to voters’ preference for repealing ObamaCare, even though she voted against it.

Best way to repeal 0bamcare is to vote the Democrats(Blue Dog, Red Dog, whatever Dog Democrats) OUT, and replace them with conservative Republicans. Republicans that charge visits to sex clubs to the RNC, need not apply.

[ontap]

People are realizing there is no such thing as a conservative democrat...blue , purple or any other color dog....they’re all just plain dogs.

[knarf]

Democrat translates into socialist, communist and/or fascist (depending on what one thinks he thinks ... ) and AMERICANS want nothing to do with anything that even smells like loss of liberty.

Clever and insidious dems will teach their protege's to look, talk and act like conservatives until they get into office.

That's the zero way.

[GonzoGOP]

Because they voted YES on Nancy Pelosi for speaker of the house.

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Hell has no fury as a voter betrayed.....

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Collateral damage......T.S.!

[bigbob]

Because they’re Democrats?

[LibFreeUSA]

They will LOSE because they are RATs, and they elected and caucus with Pelousy. NUFF SAID!

[Vigilanteman]

Only about one-third of the so-called Blue Dog Democrats are genuinely moderate. This are people like David Boren of Oklahoma, Colin Peterson of Minnesota, Gene Taylor of Mississippi and possibly others.

Most of the rest are either wobbly or wear the Blue Dog fig leaf to get elected in a conservative district.

[Red Badger]

They will pay the price of the company they keep.............

[thethirddegree]

Throw out all the crooks and start over.

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

Perhaps they should have fought harder and more publicly. Perhaps they should have taken a visible and principled stand and vigorously recruited wavering dems to vote “no”. Perhaps they would have endeared themselves to their constituents.

[grumpygresh]

Good situation for Republicans. 0bamacare was a dead end ally for the Dims. Those that voted yes in red districts will be the first to go. The faux “pro-life” that voted with Rep Stupid will feels the deserved wrath of the real pro-life movement. Those that voted no both times in red districts have a chance, but will face loony primary challenges from the leftists and a demoralized leftist base if they survive the primary.
50 seats are possible or more.

[DesertSapper]

The Dems who had the brains and intestinal fortitude to vote NO on 0bamacare should extend that positive streak and leave the Democrat Party.

FReeper's must realize that we have to do everything we can to ensure every Dem is removed from office. With that being our primary focus, we then must do the same with CINOs and RINOs. This order of operations is critical. To get rid of a Dem with a RINO is acceptable in some circumstances (see Scott Brown) but only as a last resort.

[Cheetahcat]

They are still Democrats and Have to go!

[Hardastarboard]

You can bet that I’m going to give every dime I can afford to Bart Stupak’s opponent in both the primary and in the general, if he survives.

[Lancey Howard]

Those scumbag Democrats SHOULD lose. Most of them only voted “no” because they were given permission to do so by San Fransicko Nancy. Plus, getting rid of as many scumbags as possible helps the cause of getting rid of the head communist scumbag, Nancy Pelosi.

[adorno]

Why Democrats Who Voted No On ObamaCare May Still Lose

There used to be a time when I looked at "moderate democrats" and "blue dogs" as being the "somewhat good guys" in the ranks of democrats. But, not anymore. Not when they are still democrats who, if they don't vote for a bill that increases the power of government today, they will vote on another bill that will do so the next time. Stupak had us fooled for about a year and he always wanted to vote for government takeover of health care; and there are too many others like him. Thus, "trust but verify" doesn't apply here. When it comes to democrats it's "don't ever trust and always verify".

Even if there actually are "moderate" democrats who might deserve a "second look", we should not take the chance of re-electing a single one of them. If we are to repeal and "re-do" the health care bill, then we need as many true conservatives as we can get elected. If we can't get true conservatives, perhaps we can still do the job with some RINOs replacing the "moderate" or "blue dog" democrats. While we can get busy replacing the hard-left and progressives and liberals, we can't allow the moderate or blue dogs to stay in power. We need to target every single "democrat" seat there is and try very hard to retain what we already have. A "(D)" behind any seat in congress is a potential vote against what made America great.