Give me a break on the “hate speech”. There’s no such thing. We have FREEDOM of speech in this country. You can take a hike if you don’t like, or you can denounce it; that’s fine, but you can’t censor in this country yet and hopefully you never will be able to.
“But you can’t censor in this country yet”
Yet.
Regarding the issue of “implied” violence, I believe (as I know many FReepers do) that zerobama is intentionally trying to foment violent civil war in this country, under a “divide and conquer” strategy.
It really is win-win for him. If those who love liberty and the constitution become sheep and simply cave in to socialism along with everyone else, that’s fine and dandy. On the other hand, if we resist, both passively (by refusing to obey healthcare mandates, e.g.) and even actively (by making use of our 2nd amendment right), that could be the casus belli zero needs to declare some sort of bogus “national emergency” like the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles: he could force the governors of several “problem states” to allow him to send in federal troops to “keep the peace.”
Except for supporting a very few people in Washington or associated with that crowd (Palin, Bachmann, DeMint), I would really be concentrating on sounding out the governors. Probably all demRat governors would cave to almost any demand made by zero; the Repub governors might, maybe, resist. We should be sounding out those Repub governors who show the most spine, since, in the coming months (perhaps even weeks) those states might become “refuge states” for us.
Keep in mind, too, that anything goes today. Perhaps some sort of crackpot interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause will be used to prevent free movement between the states, so (as in the former Soviet Union) we will have to apply for some sort of “internal passport” to be able to move freely around the country. As I say, anything goes today, so keep a sharp eye out for small changes in tone, attitude, position, etc. of elected officials and pundits in the mainstream media.