Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plaidness

“But you can’t censor in this country yet”

Yet.

Regarding the issue of “implied” violence, I believe (as I know many FReepers do) that zerobama is intentionally trying to foment violent civil war in this country, under a “divide and conquer” strategy.

It really is win-win for him. If those who love liberty and the constitution become sheep and simply cave in to socialism along with everyone else, that’s fine and dandy. On the other hand, if we resist, both passively (by refusing to obey healthcare mandates, e.g.) and even actively (by making use of our 2nd amendment right), that could be the casus belli zero needs to declare some sort of bogus “national emergency” like the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles: he could force the governors of several “problem states” to allow him to send in federal troops to “keep the peace.”

Except for supporting a very few people in Washington or associated with that crowd (Palin, Bachmann, DeMint), I would really be concentrating on sounding out the governors. Probably all demRat governors would cave to almost any demand made by zero; the Repub governors might, maybe, resist. We should be sounding out those Repub governors who show the most spine, since, in the coming months (perhaps even weeks) those states might become “refuge states” for us.

Keep in mind, too, that anything goes today. Perhaps some sort of crackpot interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause will be used to prevent free movement between the states, so (as in the former Soviet Union) we will have to apply for some sort of “internal passport” to be able to move freely around the country. As I say, anything goes today, so keep a sharp eye out for small changes in tone, attitude, position, etc. of elected officials and pundits in the mainstream media.


33 posted on 03/28/2010 11:14:57 PM PDT by GoodDay (Palin for POTUS 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: GoodDay

Some good advice in that post, GoodDay.


50 posted on 03/29/2010 12:23:48 AM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: GoodDay

Great post. You are thinking along the same lines as me. This all smells like a huge setup. I suspect the best way to navigate this is to ignore the cries of “racist”, “terrorist” (much like libs ignore it any time you try to engage them in a real debate) and use civil disobedience to show our resistance. Unfortunately, even if we all stay non-violent, I don’t think it will matter. Odds are good that there will be a “false flag op” to paint us as violent terrorists (gawd, I hate that I use that term like a DUmmie)


68 posted on 03/29/2010 1:22:51 AM PDT by thecabal (Destroy Progressivism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: GoodDay; F15Eagle; 444Flyer; null and void
Regarding the issue of “implied” violence, I believe (as I know many FReepers do) that zerobama is intentionally trying to foment violent civil war in this country, under a “divide and conquer” strategy. It really is win-win for him...

He is dividing the land for gain.

75 posted on 03/29/2010 4:06:57 AM PDT by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson