What the hell are you talking about? Iowahawk comes off wonderfully in this piece as a master of satire. Please explain.
Iowahawk’s comment was satirizing Parker and Noonan, not endorsing them..
You have got to be thinking of someone else other than Iowahawk-aka David Burge.
His hilarious and witty satirical pieces are always demolishing elitist tone deaf beltway type RINOs and hopelessly out of touch leftists and big government establishment types.
“Nice to see iowahawk exposed for the asshole he is.”
Nice to see you exposed for the clueless individual you are.
Hint: It’s satire. Look it up.
You're a jerk, hinckley buzzard.
"For more than a year," Van Voorhees tells us, "I have warned that . . . the conservative movement risked abandonment by its few remaining serious intellectuals"—"luminaries" like "the vivacious [Washington Post columnist] Kathleen Parker, Dame Peggy Noonan, and those two mighty Davids of conservative letters, Frum and Brooks"—and "being overrun by the unsightly hordes of Wal-Mart untermenschen typified by the loathesome 'Tea Party' rabble" with their "base enthusiasms and simian grunts. As is now obvious, events have proven me right."