Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speculation Rampant Over Cause of Naval Fiasco
Donga.com ^ | 3/29/2010 | Donga.com

Posted on 03/28/2010 4:38:07 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The government has yet to present a clear-cut explanation on how the naval patrol boat Cheonan sank Friday evening or countermeasures.

Worse, surviving crew members have given differing statements about the incident, fueling suspicion over the disaster.

1. Vessel split into two? External attack suspected

Until soon after the accident, an explosion of unknown cause reportedly created a hole in the bottom of the Cheonan’s hull. The vessel sank three hours later at 12:30 a.m. Saturday.

Cheonan Captain Choi Won-il told a briefing for the families of the 46 crew members who went missing Saturday, “One second after the explosion, the ship split into two, tipped over vertically, and sank in a matter of seconds.”

“After hearing the bang from the explosion, I went out to the captain’s room and saw the stern disappear.”

When the families of the missing crew said, “That statement is nonsense,” Choi replied, “I was wrong to say one second, but the ship sank instantly. I saw it with my own eyes.”

Choi’s comments, however, seem to contradict those made in the initial briefing on the incident by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which said the vessel started to sink after a hole was created in the hull.

Defense Minister Kim Tae-young also said Saturday, “The vessel seems to have split into two,” adding, “When we checked (the ship’s condition) with a thermal observation device, the ship looked (as if it had split in two).”

In contrast, a naval command official who accompanied the missing crew’s families to waters near Baengnyeong Island, where the Cheonan sank, reportedly said yesterday, “The Cheonan’s captain reportedly said the vessel split into two instantly, but I cannot understand that in light of common sense.”

(Excerpt) Read more at english.donga.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baengnyeongisland; cheonan; rokn; sinking; southkorea; southkoreannavy; yellowsea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2010 4:38:08 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

A structural failure may have sounded like an explosion.


2 posted on 03/28/2010 4:42:08 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Does anyone really think they don’t know what happened here? It sounds more and more like South Korea is being pressured to keep the lid on this until it gets “sorted out” and some deals can be cut to defuse the situation.


3 posted on 03/28/2010 4:43:07 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
"A structural failure may have sounded like an explosion."

Perhaps not impossible, but a catastrophic structural failure in calm waters seems very unlikely.

My money is on some kind of outside agency.

4 posted on 03/28/2010 4:45:06 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I’d suspect that more if all the stories were the same. Coulda been a mine, coulda been a bomb on inside or outside of the ship, coulda been an accident.


5 posted on 03/28/2010 4:45:10 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
look at the hole...
6 posted on 03/28/2010 4:46:17 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

*ping*


7 posted on 03/28/2010 4:47:04 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“Perhaps not impossible, but a catastrophic structural failure in calm waters seems very unlikely.”

Its my bet it was helped by some kind of explosive.


8 posted on 03/28/2010 4:48:59 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
"Does anyone really think they don’t know what happened here?"

No. I saw a picture of the wreck from yesterday, and it appears that she lays in reasonably shallow water. I would be surprised if they haven't already surveyed the damage with divers and video equipment. If so, they've already narrowed it down to several things - either an internal explosion or external explosive device (ie mine or torpedo). But, they'd no from the damage patterns if it was something from outside the hull virtually immediately. After that, it would take a little work to determine what the actual cause was.

9 posted on 03/28/2010 4:49:30 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Didn’t this occur on the SK president’s birthday? I thought I read that somewhere.


10 posted on 03/28/2010 4:49:31 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

No idea if it was his birthday.


11 posted on 03/28/2010 4:51:01 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“But, they’d no from the damage patterns if it was something from outside the hull virtually immediately.”

Excellent point. They have to know that by now; the fact that SK hasn’t said it was internal, thereby defusing the situation, makes one wonder.


12 posted on 03/28/2010 4:56:51 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I think they are trying to cover up their own incompetence. Somebody screwed up real bad. Actually several somebody’s did. They are all trying to cover themselves. That’s why there are so many conflicting stories.

This isn’t good. If the whole s korean military is this incompetent there’s not much hope of them being useful if the norks get upity.


13 posted on 03/28/2010 4:59:04 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Its my bet it was helped by some kind of explosive.

Yeah, one carried in a tube with a little propeller on the end of it.

"One of the classic film images of sea battles is that of the torpedo slamming into the side of side of a ship, setting off a huge fiery explosion. That might have been true 60 years ago, but modern torpedos do not kill their targets by "hitting" them. ...they can be powerful enough to completely rip the superstructure (that is, everything above the hull) clean off the ship, giving the appearance of a second explosion. The hull is often snapped into two separate halves. ...So while a missile kills a ship by going "Bang" on the body of the ship, a modern torpedo kills a ship by going "Bang" underneath it."


14 posted on 03/28/2010 5:04:25 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

They were in shallows, with only 24m (78 ft.) of water. To me this suggests a tethered mine. But that being said, if they continue to hem and haw, it likely means that they are going to publicly keep quiet, but work some revenge on the Nork navy.


15 posted on 03/28/2010 5:04:48 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

looks like what they are describing.


16 posted on 03/28/2010 5:06:09 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
They were in shallows, with only 24m (78 ft.) of water. To me this suggests a tethered mine.

Tethered mines are used in deeper waters.

17 posted on 03/28/2010 5:10:46 PM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

damn good post!


18 posted on 03/28/2010 5:14:04 PM PDT by Coachm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

That’s my understanding too. Modern torpedoes explode below the ship causing an air pocket and the ship first rises then falls and breaks in half. That’s what I learned from the Military Channel anyway.


19 posted on 03/28/2010 5:16:11 PM PDT by retrogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

It wasn’t calm. The story describes 3 meter waves prevented a quicker response from their rescue ships.


20 posted on 03/28/2010 5:37:34 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson