Replies

Don't forget, it's the “Tea” Party, not the “Sarah” party.

She has made too many blunders lately as well as in the past to be a viable candidate. Whether you love her, despise her, or are indifferent, merely displays an emotional connection. which has nothing to do with her abilities or her political skill. Her reputation is too unstable and the stakes are too high for us to risk another failed campaign.

In regards to political skills, she ranks in the lower half. There are many better choices.

Putting all the emotional knee jerk hype aside, I am one of those who is indifferent and would rather see Erik Cantor or Mark Rubio step up as a candidate. We have had enough controversial, vulnerable and damaged candidates in the past and cannot afford to have another. Not at such a crucial time when we risk losing everything.

Don’t forget Paul Ryan, I think he is someone to look at too as a viable candidate, the more I see him, the more I like him. I like Sarah, as you can see, but she is one of many I would gladly vote for if they ran in 2012, for me its not Sarah or bust, if I see someone who believes in the same stuff I believe in and would take this country back from the Commies, they got my vote

“She has made too many blunders lately as well as in the past to be a viable candidate.”

Which blunders are you talking about currently-supporting McCain out of loyalty or payback? If you are you don’t understand loyalty or politics. Palin would have been eaten alive by the MSM if she did not back McCain.

Or was it currently having 1.5m Facebook members or almost 3m copies of Going Rogue?

Or is it current 2nd place standing on Intrade? Would you call that a blunder?

Or targeting 20 Democrats to be taken down by the GOP because they betrayed the pro-life movement and voted for Obamacare?

Or are you referring to the Couric interview which was edited so as to make Palin look as bad as possible?

Or the $150,000 wardrobe controversy where it was proved Palin did not have any say on the purchase of the clothes besides giving her measurements and the operation was purely RNC.

Or you might be referring to her resignation that she was forced into by the Obama war room using Alinsky tactics to drive her into personal bankruptcy? So Palin should have gone broke rather than resigning?

In summary what blunders?

Putting all the emotional knee jerk hype aside, I am one of those who is indifferent and would rather see Erik Cantor or Mark Rubio step up as a candidate.

Oh, by all means. Let's put up another snoozer candidate like McCain, or Bob Dole for 2012. Surely, this time, the American people will study every issue and every candidate's record, then decide the election on the basis of the greatest good for the greatest number.

Sheeesh, friend. A candidate has to be a LOT more than just a solid conservative soldier to take the White House. And I do mean a WHOLE LOT more. Sarah Palin is the ONLY potential candidate we have in our stable that has ALL of the required attributes to beat Obama in 2012.