Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: worst-case scenario
It's fine for him to invoke sympathy to encourage others to help him or others directly. This is not the mechanism that he's advocating, however. He's putting a human face on a huge uncaring federal bureaucracy that cares not a wit about anyone. So when he uses his disability to support a government that will compel me to submit to a government bureaucrat as to what I can buy under penalty of law, I find that despicable. It may well be me sitting on the ground in front of someone pleading my case someday. I just know I don't want it to be in front of some government official, because I know in that case no will mean NO. Ever dealt with the government? I have..."we've considered your appeal, and your case is denied".
30 posted on 03/26/2010 12:54:31 PM PDT by throwback (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: throwback

Yes I’ve also dealt with unfeeling bureaucracy in a government, with people who stuck by their rules and that was it. With a tax system so complicated I can’t understand its written communications and then penalize you. With waiting for a response or a phone pickup or a turndown. Yes.

It may well be you or I sitting on the ground someday, unable to work, lost our home, in pain, too weak to stand, and we’d have someone come over and berate us for being a lazy bum for not working. But do we want a strong safety net there or not?

BTW there is an “opt-out” of the Law for states that decide to develop their own program.


31 posted on 03/26/2010 3:11:37 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson