Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would partners of gay troops get benefits, too?
AP via My Way ^ | Mar 26, 2010 | KIMBERLY HEFLING

Posted on 03/26/2010 2:29:39 AM PDT by Salman

WASHINGTON (AP) - If gay service members are allowed to serve openly, the military will face another tough question: Should gay partners be entitled to military benefits?

Momentum appears to be building for ending the ban on gays in the military. New rules ordered Thursday by Defense Secretary Robert Gates make it harder to discharge men and women under the policy known as "don't ask, don't tell." His decision is intended as a stopgap measure as Congress weighs whether to go along with President Barack Obama's request to repeal the law.

Since the draft ended in 1973, spousal benefits have increasingly been used as an incentive to recruit and retain an effective force. Today, more than half of all troops sport a wedding ring.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: agenda; bhodod; bushselectedgates; buttsex; dontenlist; gay; homosexualagenda; kickgatesassout; madnessinmilitary; military; money; samesexunions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Well well well.

No surprise really.

1 posted on 03/26/2010 2:29:39 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salman

Already reported that when the census is tabulated the gay partners will be considered ‘married’.

So, of course, they’ll be covered on the health care.


2 posted on 03/26/2010 2:33:20 AM PDT by Carley (Are you better off than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Of course they will get paid. There will be a huge “settlement” for past discriminations and there will be ‘gay pay’ along with ‘jump pay’ and ‘danger pay’.


3 posted on 03/26/2010 2:36:50 AM PDT by 999replies (Thune/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Of course. And Accommodations will be made in every facet of military life. This is not a nondiscrimination matter; rather, it’s a way to completely restructure the military, IMO.


4 posted on 03/26/2010 2:45:58 AM PDT by ElayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Would ALL of their partners get benefits? If a gay man got married and then moved in with another partner, would they both get benefits?


5 posted on 03/26/2010 2:49:09 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

“Should gay partners be entitled to military benefits?”
No, but they will.


6 posted on 03/26/2010 3:22:01 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

If they’re married they’ll receive benefits - and there are a number of States allowing same sex marriage.


7 posted on 03/26/2010 3:30:49 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

And Chaplains will be forced to sacrifice their careers if they refuse to perform gay weddings.


8 posted on 03/26/2010 3:35:08 AM PDT by Never on my watch (Duty, Honor, Country - not Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

That's the idea.

Remember this, because it is vitally important:

For homosexuals, everything, EVERYTHING, is about the act.


9 posted on 03/26/2010 3:41:20 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 999replies

***Of course they will get paid. There will be a huge “settlement” for past discriminations and there will be ‘gay pay’ along with ‘jump pay’ and ‘danger pay’.***

I wonder if these payments would be considered to be in “arrears”??


10 posted on 03/26/2010 3:46:12 AM PDT by qrstuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Since that lifestyle is so statistically “unhealthy”, it may eventually lead to no coverage for diseases associated with said lifestyle. When huge budget deficets are realized after this turkey of a bill is implemented, congress has shown that they will throw any constituency under the bus.


11 posted on 03/26/2010 4:19:15 AM PDT by Machavelli (True God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salman

How many partners can get benefits, since homos usually have so many.


12 posted on 03/26/2010 4:34:11 AM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Gates has essentially ended DADT. He has added and Don’t Look even if you have the information.


13 posted on 03/26/2010 4:49:54 AM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

THIS has been the main goal of the homosexual activists....because military are found in all states. They wish to use this to force ALL states to accept gay “marriage.”


14 posted on 03/26/2010 5:14:32 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Democrats- more and more taxes!


15 posted on 03/26/2010 5:14:42 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
What do these two "officers" have in common?

Answer: Neither one has ever seen even one minute of combat.

Mike Mullen is a pathetic piece of crap. This week he publicly slammed a 3-star for daring to question the repeal of DADT. Mullen is a career deskjockey who has no business leading our military. OFFICERS SHOULD SPEAK UP..LOUD...NOW. To hell with this pretender and his lapdog Mullen.

16 posted on 03/26/2010 5:25:00 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salman

The way I look at this, they would need to amend the UCMJ in order to even make this feasible.


17 posted on 03/26/2010 5:40:08 AM PDT by voicereason (I Don't Need SEX...I Get Screwed By Democrats Everyday!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

Just part of reparations. If only our ancestors hadn’t enslaved them....oh wait, I’m getting confused again.


18 posted on 03/26/2010 5:40:50 AM PDT by genetic homophobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

That didn’t take long.


19 posted on 03/26/2010 5:41:23 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
The UCMJ is contained within Title 10 of the USC. It cannot be administratively amended. Moreover, there are many factors that are governed by law. The Services can only amend those things in which discretionary authority is permitted.

Your elected officials are in the driver's seat.

20 posted on 03/26/2010 5:48:53 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson