Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The House must vote again...the saga continues.
1 posted on 03/25/2010 12:19:21 AM PDT by vrwc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vrwc1

The dems were using the 51 vote.


2 posted on 03/25/2010 12:27:28 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1
I figured out the next urgent move by the Dems in regard to health care. Since their idiots can't stop acting like idiots by demanding Obamacare and this is too big of an issue for the MSM to hide like usual, the Dems will pass a bill making it a crime for any health care worker to inform said moron in public that they cant have it at this time.
3 posted on 03/25/2010 12:28:47 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

So how long before Doofus overrules the Parliamentarian?


4 posted on 03/25/2010 12:29:20 AM PDT by matthew fuller (obama- rapist of the USA- "Bend over bitches, I won the election".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

Fairly certain that Pelosi hasn’t run out of things to bribe or threaten with.


5 posted on 03/25/2010 12:29:54 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

Senate Republicans succeeded early Thursday morning in finding two flaws in the House-passed Health Care reconciliation package. Neither is of any substance, but the Senate parliamentarian informed Democratic leaders that both are in violation of the Byrd Rule.

One is related to Pell Grants and the other makes small technical corrections. Why they’re in violation of the Byrd Rule doesn’t matter; the upshot is that Republicans will succeed in at least slightly altering the legislation, which means that the House is once again required to vote on it. With no substantial changes, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) should have little problem assembling the same coalition of 220 Democrats who passed the measure Sunday night.

After the Parliamentarian Alan Frumin had advised the leadership of his ruling, the Democratic and Republican leaders huddled on the Senate floor and agreed to adjourn until 9:45 a.m.

Shortly after 2:30 a.m., Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), sitting in the presiding officer’s chair, asked if there was any objection to the adjournment. “I guess we’re adjourned,” said a punch-drunk Franken, hearing none.


6 posted on 03/25/2010 12:34:41 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

A Senate Democratic aide said the one of the provisions in question involved changes to the Pell grant program, which is part of an education section in the reconciliation bill. The provision would prevent reductions in the amount of Pell grants for students from low-income families as a result of a decrease in money appropriated for the program by Congress.

Mr. Conrad said a third issue was under review by the Senate parliamentarian.

The risk for Democrats in a parliamentary challenge is that Republicans could knock out key provisions of the legislation, or win a decision that upends the mechanisms Democrats rely on to pay for the measure.

“We see no impact on the score and very insignificant impact on any policy,” Mr. Conrad said. “This is not going to be a problem.”

Mr. Conrad predicted that the Senate would complete work on the bill by 2 p.m. Thursday.

In addition to the changes to the health care legislation, the budget reconciliation measure includes a broad restructuring of federal student loan programs that will help pay for billions of dollars in education initiatives, including an increase in Pell grants for students from low-income families.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/health/policy/26health.html


7 posted on 03/25/2010 12:40:04 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

PATHETIC!!!!!


12 posted on 03/25/2010 4:54:33 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer (Don't tread on us...or you'll pay the price in the next election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

I thought that old Purple Lips already signed it into law? Did they get their cart in front of the horse? SCOTUS is going to have a ball with this.......

COME ON NOVEMBER.


13 posted on 03/25/2010 6:11:51 AM PDT by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

I would love to know what is methodical about not rejecting a provision that would ban Viagra for sex offenders.


14 posted on 03/25/2010 6:20:37 AM PDT by Lilpug15 (The Forgotten Man: He works, he votes and he generally prays - but He Always Pays": Sumner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vrwc1

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but sending this back to the House won’t make any difference, because the bill signed Monday by BarryS0 is already law.

Right?


16 posted on 03/25/2010 6:40:43 AM PDT by Jedidah (Character, courage, common sense are more important than issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson