Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security to See Payout Exceed Pay-In
NYT ^ | 3/24/10 | Mary Williams Walsh

Posted on 03/24/2010 7:49:17 PM PDT by Nachum

The bursting of the real estate bubble and the ensuing recession have hurt jobs, home prices and now Social Security.

This year, the system will pay out more in benefits than it receives in payroll taxes, an important threshold it was not expected to cross until at least 2016, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhoeconomy; budget; deficit; economy; exceed; payout; retirement; security; social; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Nachum

It’s okay: just raise taxes and print more money. :)

Problem fixed. :)


21 posted on 03/24/2010 8:12:59 PM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
You know: give a man a fish vs. teach a man to fish!

Teach a man how to fish and he'll spend the rest of his life in a boat, drinking beer.

22 posted on 03/24/2010 8:14:43 PM PDT by TherealMr.B (We're tired of your experiments. We're Americans, not some third world country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Time to start doing private retirement accounts.

Eliminate the 401K/IRA limits. Allow people to contribute as much as they want into 401K/IRA/Roth. The ones that save money, will have money for their retirement. The ones that did not, well, we know what is supposed to happen to the 'grasshopper'.

23 posted on 03/24/2010 8:34:47 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is not a problem. We will just print more.


24 posted on 03/24/2010 8:36:30 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
The is not the fault of Social Security. The money was paid in by workers.

Yes, it is the fault of SS. A Ponzi scheme has a life span. On the average, people collect more in benefits than they ever paid in. There are fewer and fewer workers paying the benefits for everyone collecting. I think it's around 2.3 workers per beneficiary right now. When boomers start retiring, it will be even less.

Yes, Congress borrowed from the trust fund, but they didn't raid it. Whatever they took out will be returned with interest. They borrowed from it to disguise the fact that they were running up the debt. That's the sham.

It's a Ponzi scheme. Younger people are screwed - they won't see a dime of what they're paying in, even after paying about 14% of their income into the fund for all their working years (and don't tell me it's only 7% because the employer pays the other 7%-the worker pays it ALL because what the employee pays is salary the worker doesn't get, but is part of the cost of the employment).

25 posted on 03/24/2010 8:51:08 PM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Or kill off some old geezers.

They just did. One half trillion dollars out of Medicare to fund Po'fokeCare!

26 posted on 03/24/2010 9:01:37 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
Time to start doing private retirement accounts. Eliminate the 401K/IRA limits. Allow people to contribute as much as they want into 401K/IRA/Roth. The ones that save money, will have money for their retirement. The ones that did not, well, we know what is supposed to happen to the 'grasshopper'.

Constant rumors that the FedGOv is planning to confiscate 401k accounts and convert them to social security payments. Better get your dough out before the retroactive hammer falls...

27 posted on 03/24/2010 9:03:27 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: randita
I've “paid in” $200,000 to Social Insecurity. I've lost that money and 40 years of investment return on that money.

I have Leukemia and I'm only 56. Diagnosed four years ago and was told I had 10 to 15 years. Hopefully in my second remission.

So much for putting in less money than I'll get out of it.

Democrat Politicians hope someone like me will die early so their wonderful Ponzi Scheme will hold on just a little longer.

I wouldn't trust a Democrat to pickup my Dogs poop.

28 posted on 03/24/2010 9:03:54 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obamunism, the fatal cure for Bush Derangement Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

>>>>Or kill off some old geezers<<<<<<
http://crabbyoldfart.wordpress.com/
go stand in the corner ... ;o)


29 posted on 03/24/2010 9:04:14 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (John has a long mustache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Cboldt; goodnesswins; unkus
I'm just into my second year of collection on early retirement. (1st crop..1946) My guess is I've got about 5 years left before the FRN is toast, along with any meaningful benefit from my formerly rich uncle.

Nam Vet

30 posted on 03/24/2010 9:05:42 PM PDT by Nam Vet (Inuendo IS NOT an Italian suppository.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet

From one Nam vet to another: We never expected this after so many years back in “The World”, did we?


31 posted on 03/24/2010 9:11:47 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oyez
They will be California-style IOU’s. Things like 30-year T-Bills, I expect. You can cash them in now for a fraction of their face value, or you can live another 30 years to get the real value. Not transferable, of course.
32 posted on 03/24/2010 9:17:31 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Well..gee...when you KILL business you get LESS in revenues...you idiots.....oh, wait, that’s what you planned!

Yup, Cloward-Piven until we are destroyed!

" Leftists such as Barack Obama euphemistically refer to this collapse as a "fundamental transformation," on the theory that society can only be improved by destroying the deeply flawed existing order and replacing it with what they view as a better alternative, i.e., socialism."

Well, we're not going to be destroyed! Revolution II is on the Way!

33 posted on 03/24/2010 9:21:39 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This year, the system will pay out more in benefits than it receives in payroll taxes, an important threshold it was not expected to cross until at least 2016, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Guess they missed that one.

Again.


34 posted on 03/24/2010 9:37:12 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey

Time to start doing private retirement accounts.
Eliminate the 401K/IRA limits. Allow people to contribute as much as they want into 401K/IRA/Roth. The ones that save money, will have money for their retirement. The ones that did not, well, we know what is supposed to happen to the ‘grasshopper’.


Good idea.

Right up to the moment when Obama takes it all.


35 posted on 03/24/2010 9:39:57 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
"Time to start doing private retirement accounts."

More like time to stop the program for younger workers. I would GLADLY sacrifice every dollar I've paid in to it, if they would only agree to take no more....

36 posted on 03/24/2010 9:41:21 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: randita

It’s a Ponzi scheme. Younger people are screwed - they won’t see a dime of what they’re paying in, even after paying about 14% of their income into the fund for all their working years (and don’t tell me it’s only 7% because the employer pays the other 7%-the worker pays it ALL because what the employee pays is salary the worker doesn’t get, but is part of the cost of the employment).

It’s 14% for all the self-employed

Can u imagine -—

39% tax + 14% SS tax +

State

house

car, highway, registration , license, passport, travel, bridge, tollway,

gasoline

electricity /water/ natural gas for the stove

FICA

State

Sales tax when you buy a book or dinner

$1 heath tax

no salt tax

WHAT IS THE TOTAL

HOW MUCH CAN THEY TAKE FROM US?

And I didn’t get a single F-22 to use.


37 posted on 03/24/2010 9:43:48 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The article has some incredible quotes that reflect the fundamental fraud underlying Social Security. Consider this whopper by Greenspan:

“Even if the trust fund level goes down, there’s no action required, until the level of the trust fund gets to zero,” he said. “At that point, you have to cut benefits, because benefits have to equal receipts.”

This incredible statement asserts that the trust fund has assets. The trust fund is a liability, not an asset. If this assertion is true, then any individual could create an asset by borrowing from himself. Another part of the article indicates that the trust fund is merely an accounting device. How can an accounting device be an asset? The trust fund receives interest payments from the general budget. How does the general fund generate funds to pay the interest to the trust fund?

The trust fund argument is essentially the idea that the same dollar can be spent twice. Excess payroll taxes have been spent on other programs. The trust fund argument indicates that the excess payroll taxes were both spent and saved.

The fact that Social Security now pays more in benefits than it receives in payroll taxes is ominous. This event was not projected to occur until 2017. Social Security is now a growing factor in the deficit. Government borrowing must occur to cover the payroll tax deficit. Since it appears that government bonds cannot be sold in such large numbers, the printing press is the only answer. The value of the dollar is set for a dramatic fall as the money supply increases substantially.


38 posted on 03/24/2010 10:02:06 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Here comes the original 800 pound gorilla that everyone has been ignoring for decades - and that makes the hypocrisy of the American Fascist Party, formerly the Democratic Party, especially galling.

Obamacare Caduceus, tiny version
39 posted on 03/24/2010 10:03:51 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Its a shame we didnt have Bernie Maddof running it. We probably would have gotten another 50 years out of it.


40 posted on 03/24/2010 10:35:18 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson