Replies

Amen. God bless our doctors. They already hate the constraints placed upon them by our insurance companies. But the Federal Government will be an impossible taskmaster.

I know many older docs who are “set” will be retiring early. I know many younger docs have decided to go back to school to pursue a different career.

Although your absence will be a great inconvenience to the rest of us, this new law targets you even more directly than we patients. So we understand and support your “going Galt.”

Hope to see you again after we have slayed the ObamaCare monster (and passed a constitutional amendment to guarantee that such a tyranny will never happen again).

By the way, isn’t it odd that the lawyers in Congress don’t see a need for the American people to have access to quality, affordable legal services? After all, if you can barely afford your health care premiums, how can you possibly afford to pay $200/hour for a lawyer to sue the a$$ off your doctor for malpractice?

(and passed a constitutional amendment to guarantee that such a tyranny will never happen again).

I appreciate the sentiment but this bunch doesn't obey the Constitution now so why would they obey an amended one?

After all, they are the ones who want to take our Constitutionally mandated right to bear arms away from us. How much plainer can that be? It is only the 2nd Amendment so what would another amendment do?

By the way, isn’t it odd that the lawyers in Congress don’t see a need for the American people to have access to quality, affordable legal services? ...excellent point - but more than a need, it's a right - the Constitution after all is a political/legal document, so one might argue that in fact the right to free legal assistance on demand is the primary right all citizens should have in order to be able to exercise their citizenship to the fullest......