Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
I'm still turning it over in my head, but I think you have something here.

The Administration's lawyers will no doubt argue that a lot of what you've quoted here is dicta. However, from what I've seen, the Justices tend to have a much narrower view of what constitutes dicta than the average lawyer.

You know, even with "community rating" and "guaranteed issue", I don't see how anyone can get insurance without submitting to a medical exam or at least answering a questionnaire about private medical facts. Being compelled to do either clearly violates the right to privacy as defined by Griswold.
47 posted on 03/24/2010 3:16:49 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight; xzins; blue-duncan; wagglebee; SnakeDoctor; wmfights; Forest Keeper
You know, even with "community rating" and "guaranteed issue", I don't see how anyone can get insurance without submitting to a medical exam or at least answering a questionnaire about private medical facts. Being compelled to do either clearly violates the right to privacy as defined by Griswold.

Here's something scary. If the government can compel you to get health care or health insurance, they can compel you to get annual medical examinations..... including.... PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS....

Think about that one for a minute.

51 posted on 03/24/2010 3:24:56 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson