A delicious irony if this legislation were overturned on the basis of the Griswold decision.
1 posted on
03/24/2010 1:39:13 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: P-Marlowe
I read in some emanation or penumbra that Obama is an asshat!
88 posted on
03/25/2010 7:08:18 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: P-Marlowe
89 posted on
03/25/2010 8:51:11 AM PDT by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: Congressman Billybob
90 posted on
03/25/2010 8:56:57 AM PDT by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: P-Marlowe; Alamo-Girl
They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. " Wonderful essay, P-Marlowe! Thank you so very much!
93 posted on
03/25/2010 10:39:35 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Moral law is not rooted in factual laws of nature; they only tell us what happens, not what ought to)
To: EdReform; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
94 posted on
03/25/2010 10:58:44 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: P-Marlowe
The right to be let alone (sigh) if only.....
To: P-Marlowe
Great Post -thank you!
I was thinking alomg similar lines and posted here:
Any Legal Scholars? Abortion & Healthcare Reform are legally incongruent?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2481482/posts
110 posted on
03/27/2010 9:37:38 PM PDT by
DBeers
( †)
To: P-Marlowe
113 posted on
03/29/2010 10:50:39 AM PDT by
Weirdad
(A Free Republic, not a "democracy" (mob rule))
To: P-Marlowe
An interesting thought I had:
As per our Constitution, unlike health care, a Legal Defense is a specifically an identified right -even, as has been held, for non citizens.
Now, if one compares and constrasts how this established and specifically identified right is handled, has been handled, and codified into law and practice one should easily be able to see just how far this newly derived right of health care is overstepping by its very nature...
IF this supposed right has been there all along then where has it been hiding in regard to law and common practice? Further, IF it is deemed a right THEN why the disparity between how a legal defense has commonly been afforded and how health care is now afforded under this new law?
In my opinion, the health care reform law is comparable to requiring citizens to purchase an insurance policy for potential legal problems -in essence maintaining a law firm on a contingency basis -all this is a right? How can a right be mandatory?
115 posted on
03/29/2010 10:15:01 PM PDT by
DBeers
( †)
To: All
"..They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. Exactly. bttt
116 posted on
03/31/2010 12:59:03 PM PDT by
Matchett-PI
(Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson