[Weirdad]

I would bet that Joseph Farah noticed your post (though he did not apply it or articulate the issues optimally in his editorial -- doubt he wants those articles to be too long)...

---

BETWEEN THE LINES
Roe v. Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al.
Exclusive: Joseph Farah applies abortion 'privacy' argument to nationalized health care
--WND (3/32/2010)

---

[P-Marlowe]

I would bet that Joseph Farah noticed your post

It's possible, but my point was that we stay away from Roe and concentrate on the holding in Griswold. Farah must have missed that message.

Roe is based on Griswold, but is a bastardization of the holding. Griswold stands for the proposition that dealings between a doctor and patient re: healthcare are confidential and under the protection of the privacy right enunciated in Griswold and therefore the government has no business getting involved in those decisions.

Whether or not a abortion qualifies as healthcare is a horse of a different color.