Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fire in the sky: the Air Launched Sortie Vehicle of the early 1980s (part 3)
The Space Review ^ | 3/23/2010 | Dwayne Day

Posted on 03/23/2010 8:59:09 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

A few years ago a company by the name of AirLaunch had a novel idea for a rocket—put it in a C-17 cargo plane and then slide it out the back at high altitude. The rocket would rotate until it was vertical and then fire, heading into orbit. You can watch video of the drop tests.

“We examined a wide variety of propellants ranging from storable hypergolics, RP/LOX, to fluorine/deuterium.” That may sound exotic, but Ehrlich joked that “this was a paper study!”

Now imagine that instead of a relatively small rocket, there was a much larger rocket, with a pilot sitting in the nose, watching as he was pulled out of the back of a massive C-5 Galaxy cargo aircraft. And imagine that pilot falling backward, hundreds of feet, before a powerful Space Shuttle Main Engine ignited to push him into orbit. In the late 1980s Rockwell International, which built the Space Shuttle, proposed just such a system to the Air Force. According to Carl Ehrlich, an engineer for the company at the time, they had been inspired by footage of a 1974 test which involved dropping a Minuteman ICBM out the back of a C-5 and launching it. That test had proven successful, although the Air Force did not adopt the mobile ICBM concept. Ehrlich and other Rockwell engineers believed that there were certain advantages to air-launching a rocket, including rapid response and the ability to launch from virtually any location to any orbit.

(Excerpt) Read more at thespacereview.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airlaunched; c17; convair; edwardsafb; rocket; rockwell; space; spacecraft; spaceexploration; spaceshuttle; usaf

1 posted on 03/23/2010 8:59:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Minuteman 1 ICBM Air Launch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=It7SQ546xRk


2 posted on 03/23/2010 9:00:51 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


3 posted on 03/23/2010 9:13:02 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
I understand the military advantage of launching an ICBM out of the back of a C-5. I can even see the advantage of being able to launch a spy payload into any orbit on short notice.

But what advantage would a manned missile have over a ground launch? You gain maybe 20,000 ft altitude, about 5 seconds of burn, and your airspeed is esentially zero.

Maybe the only advantage I see is the ability to reach the ISS without having to wait for a specific launch window by placing the aircraft at the appropriate location on the globe?

4 posted on 03/24/2010 4:56:42 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

You have rapid response and the ability to launch from virtually any location to any orbit and target.


5 posted on 03/24/2010 6:19:31 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson