Skip to comments.
Rep. Conyers: ‘Good and Welfare Clause’ Gives Congress Authority to Mandate Health Insurance
CNS News ^
| 3/23/2010
| Nicholas Ballasy
Posted on 03/23/2010 7:05:57 AM PDT by NMEwithin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
1
posted on
03/23/2010 7:05:57 AM PDT
by
NMEwithin
To: NMEwithin
This coming from the husband of a recently convicted felon.
To: NMEwithin
Im chairman of the Judiciary committee, as you knowLord help us all!
3
posted on
03/23/2010 7:08:01 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: NMEwithin
This coming from a liar and a thief.
Conyers would better spend his time preparing for incarceration.
4
posted on
03/23/2010 7:08:10 AM PDT
by
Howie66
(The one redeeming thing about liberals: their tendency to kill their own.)
To: NMEwithin
“However, there is no good and welfare clause “
Yes there is, it is right between the abortion and reparations rights clauses.
5
posted on
03/23/2010 7:08:13 AM PDT
by
coaltrain
To: NMEwithin
It won't after the Constitutional Convention.
I think we either need to find a conservative organization that already supports a constitutional convention or start one - funded as seriously as the unions are funded.
6
posted on
03/23/2010 7:08:57 AM PDT
by
The Duke
To: NMEwithin
He is showing his ignorance of the constitution that he claims to know so well....the lies just keep on coming.....
7
posted on
03/23/2010 7:09:05 AM PDT
by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: NMEwithin
coming from a guy who admitted he did not read the bill. “It would take hours and a couple of lawyers to do that” What a dumb a$$. Clueless.
8
posted on
03/23/2010 7:09:39 AM PDT
by
70th Division
(I love my country but fear my government!)
To: thethirddegree
and un-indicted co conspirator.......
9
posted on
03/23/2010 7:09:56 AM PDT
by
Nekman
(The only good communists are Dead Communists....extrapolate at your own risk.)
To: NMEwithin
“promote general wellfare”
The declaration spells out what the founders were about, and the constitution soells out how to go about it. Right?
10
posted on
03/23/2010 7:10:14 AM PDT
by
devistate one four
(If you can't feed it, don't breed it! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
To: coaltrain
Yes there is, it is right between the abortion and reparations rights clauses. And that's just before the "if you don't win, deem that you have" clause
To: NMEwithin
12
posted on
03/23/2010 7:11:54 AM PDT
by
Touch Not the Cat
(Where is the light? Wonder if it's weeping somewhere...)
To: NMEwithin
These Communist are good at making it up as they go along.
13
posted on
03/23/2010 7:11:54 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
To: thethirddegree
“This coming from the husband of a recently convicted felon.”
Yes...and who refused to spend any of his stolen resources to defend his wife, preferring that TAXPAYERS be charged for her defense via a court appointed attorney!!! Not MUCH of a thug, is he??!!
To: NMEwithin
Does anyone else find it amazing that it’s taken over 220 years for Congress to realize that the “good and welfare clause” of the Constitution gives Congress the power to mandate that their subjects purchase a product or service?
15
posted on
03/23/2010 7:12:40 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
To: NMEwithin
Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution clearly enumerates what "general welfare" means. Coyners is a frikin' idiot. An uneducated asshat!
16
posted on
03/23/2010 7:12:40 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: illiac
17
posted on
03/23/2010 7:12:50 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: devistate one four
Promote does now equal “mandate”...
18
posted on
03/23/2010 7:12:54 AM PDT
by
LaineyDee
(Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
To: NMEwithin
I’m guessing he means “promote the general welfare” clause in the preamble to the Constitution.
19
posted on
03/23/2010 7:13:31 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: The Duke
I don’t support a Constitutional Convention... why mess with perfection? We need someone, ANYONE, in public office to stand up for the existing law!
20
posted on
03/23/2010 7:13:46 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson