That is in NJ.
Their state constitution has an amendment allowing for the recall of a Senator. They must collect the signatures of 20% of the electorate and it’s placed on the next ballot for a vote by the electorate.
Their Sec. of State was refusing to allow a Tea Party Group up there from even beginning the collect signatures on a petition. Their NJ Appeals Court just ruled that they State must allow the collection of signatures; they did not rule on the constitutionality of removing a sitting Senator.
It’s a step in the right direction.
I’ve though as you have (imagine that!!!) S.C. SHOULD begin the steps to remove Graham. He’s already been admonished by the SC-GOP twice and is not popular. If there is a Senator who could be the test case for removal in the USSC it’s Graham. Even if they lose, what a message that would send.
Thanks. I knew I read it somewhere and your description jogs the memory. See ya Friday!