Posted on 03/20/2010 9:56:57 PM PDT by neverdem
Just occasionally you find yourself at an event where there is a sense of history in the air. So it was the other night at the Royal Society, when a small gathering of luminaries turned up to hear that extraordinary nonagenarian, the scientist James Lovelock.
They had all come: David MacKay, chief scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change; Michael Green, Lucasian professor of mathematics at Cambridge; Michael Wilson, producer of the James Bond movies; Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum; and more. You knew why they had answered the Isaac Newton Institutes invitation. They wanted to learn where one of the most interesting minds in science stood in the climate debate.
Lovelock has been intimately involved in three of the defining environmental controversies of the past 60 years. He invented an instrument that made it possible to detect the presence of toxic pollutants in the fat of Antarctic penguins at roughly the same time as Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, her hugely influential book about pollution. In the 1970s the same instrument, his...
--snip--
What, I wondered, would be the great mans view on the latest twists in the atmospheric story the Climategate emails and the sloppy science revealed in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)? To my surprise, he immediately professed his admiration for the climate-change sceptics.
I think you have to accept that the sceptics have kept us sane some of them, anyway, he said. They have been a breath of fresh air. They have kept us from regarding the science of climate change as a religion. It had gone too far that way. There is a role for sceptics in science. They shouldnt be brushed aside. It is clear that the angel side wasnt without sin.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
“...the Angel side wasn’t without sin...”
Well, that gives a lot of insight into Lovelock’s thinking, now doesn’t it?
Ping.
“...the Angel side wasnt without sin...
Well, that gives a lot of insight into Lovelocks thinking, now doesnt it?”
Good catch!
I’ll give him some credit, though, for possibly having learned in his old age that the way to hell is paved with good intentions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.