Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYE is a NO!! (one we needed to keep)
nro ^ | 3/20/2010 | nro

Posted on 03/20/2010 7:48:57 PM PDT by milwguy

Nye, No [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

From the Virginian-Pilot:

U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye announced Saturday night he is voting against against the Democratic health care bill today, saying it doesn’t do enough to lower the cost of health care.

“Over the past year, I have spoken with countless small business owners, families, medical professionals, and average citizens across Virginia’s 2nd District, and it became very clear that this bill was not the right solution for Virginia’s health care challenges,” Nye said in a written statement. “There were many strong points in this bill that I would have been happy to support individually, but the package as a whole had serious problems.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; glennnye; healthcare; obama; pelosi; va2010; virginia
Very good news...........If the abortion block behind Stupak is not resolved, this thing is going down. For Obama to issue executive order should not be enough cover....Here is a letter from a law professor who has argued and written briefs on abortion law since the 70's. He feels the established law will REQUIRE funds allocated by the Senate law to be used to fund abortion...

http://www.nrlc.org/ahc/DestroLetterToStupakOnCommHealthCenters.pdf

1 posted on 03/20/2010 7:48:57 PM PDT by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milwguy

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2475736/posts


2 posted on 03/20/2010 7:50:54 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Armed And Cantankerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

It will be irrelevant even if the socialists ram this through Congress! Any federal version of health care is unconstitutional since Article 1 Section 8 does not specifically grant Congress the power to regulate health care! The people are not bound to comply with any unconstitutional act of Congress! The people are the government and will have the final say as to how they will be governed! These points need to be conveyed to Congress critters!


3 posted on 03/20/2010 7:51:58 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Saying it doesn’t do enough to lower the cost of health care is rather like saying gasoline doesn’t do enough to dampen a fire. Still his NO vote is appreciated.


4 posted on 03/20/2010 7:52:17 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

How can that be? FOX says they have 217-218 without Stupak and company. I also saw Dick Morris on Huckabee...first time I’ve seen him pessimistic...said he’s going after eight traitors in particular in November. Of course, the horse will be long out of the barn by then. I keep praying.


5 posted on 03/20/2010 7:54:08 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Yes, if it just cost a little less he wouldn’t mind rationing health care, giving Grandma a pain pill, and driving away our doctors.


6 posted on 03/20/2010 7:55:44 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

There aren’t even 435 votes because of the recent departures. There are 431 it appears.


7 posted on 03/20/2010 7:55:57 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

I know; that’s why it only takes 216.


8 posted on 03/20/2010 7:57:12 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rushmom
FOX says they have 217-218 without Stupak and company.

Let's say they are correct. This is not catastrophic. That means there are about 40 dems in red districts that need to make a choice.

One of two things happen. Either one of them votes no in an attempt to save his ass, or there are 40 dems who will be ousted in November.

9 posted on 03/20/2010 8:00:33 PM PDT by outofstyle (Anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

There are 431 possible voters, Fox’s numbers don’t add up.


10 posted on 03/20/2010 8:04:20 PM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

To heck with Fox News. I have been following a progressive website that actually has a very good roll call count going. I saw someone mention the site here at FR.

See (right column): http://firedoglake.com/

Favor 205
Lean favor 0

Against 207
Lean Against 10

Undecided 9

Add CNN has a list of how Dems voted last time: http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2010/03/politics/health.care.votes/index.html


11 posted on 03/20/2010 8:04:42 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

I should update my post to you given that NYE is a no.

Favor 205
Lean favor 0

Against 208
Lean Against 10

Undecided 8


12 posted on 03/20/2010 8:07:13 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: avacado
That looks like it's on the mark with this site
13 posted on 03/20/2010 8:08:22 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Only stupid, racists people support Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: randita

Fox isn’t saying “The vote will be 217 to 218”, but “The Democrats have between 217 and 218 Yes votes even without the Stu Pack, so they can pass the bill”


14 posted on 03/20/2010 8:12:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

If there are 208 against compared to 205 for it, and 10 leaning toward no with an aditional 8 undecided, it actually looks good for our side. Am I missing something?


15 posted on 03/20/2010 8:15:34 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: avacado
If you use The Hill numbers it looks good for us.

But nothing is for certain.

16 posted on 03/20/2010 8:22:05 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Only stupid, racists people support Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

They are still just working out who will be the sacrificial lambs.


17 posted on 03/20/2010 10:42:05 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

All who vote No should be listed— their loyalty to freedom should make them “safe” like the French Nobles who sided with the people in the Revolution. Their jobs should be safe in the next election. Some did so at great peril and in the face of Obama’s endless anger. They should be rewarded—even RINOs like Scott Brown.


18 posted on 03/21/2010 7:20:35 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

I will contribute to any dem who stands with us (regardless of why) if we defeat this monstrosity. We can fight another day.


19 posted on 03/21/2010 7:22:36 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (A HERO stands with the American People; A COWARD cannot stand up to one man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson