Skip to comments.
First term Democrat Nye voting against health care bill (BIG "NO" PICKUP!)
Hampton Roads ^
| 3-20-10
| Bill Bartel
Posted on 03/20/2010 7:20:52 PM PDT by icwhatudo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 last
To: thouworm
I quoted you in post 100. Thank you and FRegards ....
101
posted on
03/21/2010 1:26:44 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Weakening McCain strengthens our borders, weakens guest worker aka amnesty)
To: Persevero
Yes it is exciting. FDL also lists some very good reasons as to why Sanchez is MIA. She has a well funded Rep challenger, Van Tran who is a son of the growing Vietnamese community there. Apparently Vietnamese go 2/1 GOP.
To: lovesdogs
STUPAK 12 IS GROWING [?]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2475875/posts
a Google site | 3/21/10 | unk.
Congressman Paul Broun (GA) met with a group of supporters around midnight tonight at the Cannon office building. Word is that the healthcare reform debate has distilled-down into a battle over abortion (you may already be aware) he gave me a message and concrete list of Congressmen who (as of late-tonight) are on the fence and potential converts to vote NO tomorrow. This list is much bigger than the media is reporting and its directly from Congressman Broun. [snip]
103
posted on
03/21/2010 2:09:27 AM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Weakening McCain strengthens our borders, weakens guest worker aka amnesty)
To: mlocher
Why did he wait so long to announce? Don't get me wrong, I am glad he is a "no", but given his statement, he should have reached this decision weeks ago.when the "particulars" in the bill concerning TriCARE were released.....Nye knew he was in BIG trouble with a Yes vote.......you want to find a CD in this country with a very large number of military retirees...just look at Virginia 2nd.....and I still think he is in trouble in November, even after a Pelosi Pass to vote no....
To: moose2004
You are correct. I was thinking he was in the same column as Childers when I used CTRL+F to locate. Sorry about that.
To: matthew fuller
I believe that you are misunderstanding or misusing the meaning of "irrelevant"
I know the the meaning. The term is on the mark. It is exactly what I meant to post.
This proposed deathcare monstrosity is in no way "unimportant", "insignificant", "negligible", or "immaterial".
It is irrelevant because it is unconstitutional. The only relevant matter is what Congress is allowed to consider per the specifically listed powers in Article 1 Section 8. Regulating health care is not listed in Article Section 8. It immediately renders any prior action of Congress, with respect to health care, unconstitutional. Any adherence to the federal government on this matter and any subsequent action by the federal government immediately becomes immaterial regardless of the content.
106
posted on
03/21/2010 4:43:07 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: icwhatudo
He’s voting no because it “doesn’t do enough.” In other words he wants a ride on Air Force One.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson