Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaestroLC

If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill.


4 posted on 03/20/2010 8:07:13 AM PDT by CSI007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CSI007

Don’t bet the farm


6 posted on 03/20/2010 8:08:22 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007
If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill.

Or she has nothing to offer him that wouldn't lose votes on the pro abort side.

8 posted on 03/20/2010 8:08:45 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007
"If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill"

Huh? That may not be true at all. If she had the votes, she'd be shouting it from the rooftops of MSM outlets everywhere and locking down the Capitol to vote on it. JMHO

11 posted on 03/20/2010 8:10:12 AM PDT by atc23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007
If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill.

You don't know that.

12 posted on 03/20/2010 8:10:32 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

I heard different. I understood that if she cuts a deal with Stupak, she loses 40 of so pro abortion dems. That would make a deal counter-productive.


15 posted on 03/20/2010 8:11:05 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

Nope, she has been told to fall on her sword by Obama. He will pin this failure on her.


20 posted on 03/20/2010 8:13:30 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

Not at all. Why even waste time with them? Nazi first wanted to try to get this with a straight vote. Since she can’t, she’ll go the Slaughter way.


23 posted on 03/20/2010 8:14:20 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

[If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill.]

Or, it means she will lose more votes than she has to gain by allowing the Stupak amendment. Some pro-abortion Rat congresswomen were throwing a real hissy fit over this.


39 posted on 03/20/2010 8:24:23 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007
If this is true then she already has the votes she needs for passage of the bill.

That's the problem with this kind of "inside baseball" info right now: it could either be good news or bad news.

I am still stunned at how much trouble the dems are having getting this thing through. On paper, this should be a slam-dunk.

I have been thinking that the election of O has done more for conservative/libertarian values and political activism by our side than anything in recent memory. If that sodden old fool McCain had been elected, he would be ramming the same stuff through. I am wondering if the best thing for con/lib values would be for this beast to pass with the maximum amount of chicanery.

It's time to force a crisis on our terms.

45 posted on 03/20/2010 8:27:07 AM PDT by ajwharton (FL GOP Pollwatcher, ACORN-buster, now in NH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

No it doesn’t. She has been advised by the pro-abortion feminazi congresscritters that they have 40 votes ready to vote no if she attempts to remove abortion funding language. It’s easier for her to manage the 12 pro-life “no” votes than to hit the brakes and corral the 40 baby-killer votes that are threatening to go AWOL.

It’s simple math. She can’t please both masters, so she chose the easier path to passage.


54 posted on 03/20/2010 8:29:51 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Enjoy nature - eat meat, wear fur and drive your car!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

That’s exactly what I am afraid of!


71 posted on 03/20/2010 8:43:56 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Thinking of using 911 for protection? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: CSI007

Alternatively, she must cast him aside . He is running out the clock.

she must spend her time on somebody that actually might be bribed.


76 posted on 03/20/2010 8:47:36 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Tax the poor. Taxes will give them a stake in society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson