Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BARLF

From Hot Air (must read whole post from Allahpundit):

Chaos: Pelosi reaches deal with Stupak for Senate abortion vote?
posted at 11:51 pm on March 19, 2010 by Allahpundit

“Makes no sense.”

(snip)

A friend of the site e-mailed us about an hour ago to say that he spoke to a Democratic congressman he’s pals with earlier tonight. Quote:

“He tells me with certainty that they have plenty of votes and that some yes votes will be allowed to vote no if they choose for their protection. He says that everyone’s internal polling has been much better than expected. He says at this point that last sticking point is whether to give Stupak a separate vote, which Pelosi is considering.”

(snip)

Exit question: Is this all just lefty spin being fed to Firedoglake by peeved pro-choicers? We’ll find out at Stupak’s presser tomorrow. 11 a.m.!

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/19/chaos-pelosi-reaches-deal-with-stupak-for-senate-abortion-vote/


119 posted on 03/19/2010 9:35:17 PM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: thouworm
Thanks

In other words as of this minute Pelosi isn't assured of having the votes.

Everyone has a tip,(lol) we out here in the real world just have to keep praying for Divine Intervention. Sure can't depend on a democrat, Stupak or any other.

125 posted on 03/19/2010 9:51:32 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: thouworm
“He tells me with certainty that they have plenty of votes and that some yes votes will be allowed to vote no if they choose for their protection. He says that everyone’s internal polling has been much better than expected. He says at this point that last sticking point is whether to give Stupak a separate vote, which Pelosi is considering.”

Plenty of votes does not square with those who are keeping close tallies. Those tallies show the publicly stated no votes are only one or two shy of 216. If that's how it stays, then the yes votes could only be a few more than 216. That's not "plenty". But maybe those who have said they're voting no are lying just to get people to stop calling their offices so that tally could be inaccurate.

Most of the members in Stupak's coalition have not declared either way.

It is a risky maneuver to give Stupak a separate vote, because if enough Republicans vote "present", that vote would fail and what would that gain Stupak and his gang if they turn around and then vote FOR the Senate bill? It would just demonstrate that they don't really have principles, they just want to appear as if they have them.

There is a lot of misinformation and confusion out there. Much of it makes no sense whatever.

129 posted on 03/19/2010 9:57:27 PM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson