Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Sorry, but this type of response only has moral significance when you have not been engaged in the same conversation before hand. No one twisted your arm to start posting to me, so there's no point in pretending to be above this conversation now.

Sorry, but this type of response indicates that the responder cannot refute the argument, but opts instead to either encourage the adversary to take his toys and go home, or does so himself.

210 posted on 03/29/2010 7:39:48 PM PDT by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: elkfersupper
Sorry, but this type of response indicates that the responder cannot refute the argument, but opts instead to either encourage the adversary to take his toys and go home, or does so himself.

Actually, the response indicates that I'm not that interested in your attempts to change the conversation. The argument was Reagan opposing libertarianism. Your inability to respond to my last comment is an admission that you've lost that argument. As much as you may wish to change the subject to current events, I happen to think that all libertarians are complete idiots. I don't value your input, so I'm not looking for it. When you try to re-write history to enlist Reagan into your cause, I'll correct you, but that's as far as I go with people base their politics on an incomplete philosophy.

211 posted on 03/30/2010 3:50:12 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson