How about a 50% premium for homosexuals?
How about a 50% premium for the overweight?
I was *just* going to say that!
Homosexuals and women of childbearing age.
Childbirth is consistently the largest expense on our company plan.
Single straight men (and infertile women) bear the costs of others.
Smokers shorten their life by about 7 years ...
Homosexuals shorten their life by about 35 years.
(This is based on actuarial science!)
So ...smokers should get some surcharge ...legitimately - but homosexuals should have a MUCH HIGHER charge. Note that smokers tend to be active/productive members of society, and, when they die - there is actual savings on Social Security payments, etc.
On the other hand - homosexuals pay into the system far less ...and start the big draw out (HIV/AIDs drugs and special care) when they should still be contributing. So theoretically ...a smoker surcharge might be 10%, and a Homosexual Surcharge should be about 150% to 250%!!
But this administration and Congress has already proven that actual Science and facts won’t influence their actions!!
AMEN! But I think the Extra Premium for GAYs should be OBAMA’s now famous 3000%, only this time a PLUS 3000%, because for years we were lied to and told AIDS was a Disease that didn’t discriminate, but it does and they Know they are doing a very high risk action.
How about we don’t fall for their divide-and-conquer tactics? Truth is, more people die before their time from high-pressure office jobs than anything.
Take it from me, there’s nothing more stressful than laying off 100 people in one day.