To: Xottamoppa
I wouldn't want this because it could be warped in all sorts of ways by activist judges who see rights where they don't exist and ignore rights that are distinctly spelled out already.
I appreciate the thought behind it but I think a constitutional amendment is no antidote for strong leadership.
11 posted on
03/18/2010 5:35:56 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
To: OrangeHoof
who see rights where they don't exist and ignore rights that are distinctly spelled out already. The Constitution doesn't tell us what our rights are, it spells out what the US Government can do.
14 posted on
03/18/2010 5:44:55 PM PDT by
carenot
(We'd rather hold on to the myth than fight for the reality)
To: OrangeHoof
i was with you till that last two words; “strong leadership” is exactly what the Founders feared. The People were never meant to be led by government; only protected from foreign invaders.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson