Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Xottamoppa
I wouldn't want this because it could be warped in all sorts of ways by activist judges who see rights where they don't exist and ignore rights that are distinctly spelled out already.

I appreciate the thought behind it but I think a constitutional amendment is no antidote for strong leadership.

11 posted on 03/18/2010 5:35:56 PM PDT by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeHoof
who see rights where they don't exist and ignore rights that are distinctly spelled out already.

The Constitution doesn't tell us what our rights are, it spells out what the US Government can do.

14 posted on 03/18/2010 5:44:55 PM PDT by carenot (We'd rather hold on to the myth than fight for the reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: OrangeHoof

i was with you till that last two words; “strong leadership” is exactly what the Founders feared. The People were never meant to be led by government; only protected from foreign invaders.


22 posted on 03/18/2010 11:15:49 PM PDT by Xottamoppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson