Charity Navigator rating on the Freddom Alliance:
4 out of 5 Stars
Overall Rating (65.65)
Organizational Efficiency
Program Expenses 81.5%
Administrative Expenses 4.8%
Fundraising Expenses 13.5%
Fundraising Efficiency $0.09
Efficiency Rating (35.65)
Organizational Capacity
Primary Revenue Growth 7.4%
Program Expenses Growth 28.3%
Working Capital Ratio (years) 2.57
Capacity Rating (30.00)
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6590
I’d say 4 out of 5 is pretty darn good.
It all depends on what you classify as program expenses. The program expenses look bogus. The postage, printing abd consulting fees are fron fundraising - check the tzex returns. This is going to be a big story. Hannity is going to have to dig deep to off set what is going on here.
The Charity Navigator rating was noted in the article. For what it is worth.
Thank you for stating real facts. Charity Navigator is a reputatble charitable watchdog group and I’d take their facts over that loony Schusser anyday.
The numbers are not too far off from the American Cancer Society. Sean will be fine.
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6495
“Charity Navigator rating on the Freddom Alliance:
4 out of 5 Stars
Overall Rating (65.65)
Organizational Efficiency
Program Expenses 81.5%
Administrative Expenses 4.8%
Fundraising Expenses 13.5%
Fundraising Efficiency $0.09
Efficiency Rating (35.65)
Organizational Capacity
Primary Revenue Growth 7.4%
Program Expenses Growth 28.3%
Working Capital Ratio (years) 2.57
Capacity Rating (30.00)
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6590
“
Details Details Details.
She can’t be bothered by small details like this.