Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: massgopguy
SCOTUS ruled in United States vs Reynolds that coercing a citizen to enter in to a contract (which is what a health insurance policy is) violates the “wheel of servitude” as defined by the 13th Amendment.

Isn't United States vs Reynolds where Religious duty is not a suitable defense to a criminal indictment?

14 posted on 03/18/2010 12:11:58 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: qam1

That was Reynolds vs United States.


25 posted on 03/18/2010 1:11:06 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson