Skip to comments.
Levin Will Challenge Slaughter Rule
MarkLevinShow.com ^
| March 16, 2010
| Mark Levin
Posted on 03/17/2010 10:32:54 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
If the House uses the Slaughter Rule to advance the Senate bill, Landmark Legal Foundation and Mark will, in fact, bring a federal lawsuit in the District of Columbia challenging its constitutionality.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; deemocrats; democrats; healthcare; hr3590; lawsuit; levin; marklevin; obamacare; slaughter; slaughterrule; slaughtersolution; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: RC2
There need to be lawsuits across the country. Relentless!
21
posted on
03/17/2010 10:40:01 AM PDT
by
taraytarah
(Victim of massive tagline layoff.)
To: taraytarah
mark levin would make a great supreme court justice
22
posted on
03/17/2010 10:40:05 AM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner; holdonnow
Mark.....you ARE the man!
Thank you and God Bless you!!!!
23
posted on
03/17/2010 10:41:09 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(In this election year, we'll see many daring Davids take on entrenched Goliaths.)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I pray it doesn’t go that far but if it does, Thank you and God Bless You Mr Levin!
24
posted on
03/17/2010 10:44:41 AM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(Pro-Choice = Pro-Death........ Pro-Life = Pro-LIFE!)
To: taraytarah
To: Commander X
I'd rather have Mark on the Supreme Court.
Talk about making the Liberals' heads explode.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
26
posted on
03/17/2010 10:47:35 AM PDT
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: nutmeg
Great news!
Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation has a lot of stuff on the table, glad they can weigh in on this one too.
27
posted on
03/17/2010 10:47:44 AM PDT
by
Syncro
(TPXIII coming soon! March 27th to April 15th 2010)
To: Commander X
I would vote on that ticket!
28
posted on
03/17/2010 10:47:51 AM PDT
by
Irenic
To: LonePalm
Oh oh! that’s a great idea too!
29
posted on
03/17/2010 10:49:12 AM PDT
by
Irenic
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
It's a shame that a Conservative Radio Talk Show host has to do what the GOP Members of Congress can't or won't do. If this goes to the Supreme Court, I hope the Justices are still pissed for being dissed by Obama at the State of the Union speech. They are human you know....they are NOT supreme.
30
posted on
03/17/2010 10:49:34 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Palin / Rubio 2012)
To: Commander X
I love Sarah Palin but I’d go for Mark Levin for Prez.
31
posted on
03/17/2010 10:50:41 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Palin / Rubio 2012)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
I listened to Mark last night about this matter. He was absolutely ON FIRE!
32
posted on
03/17/2010 10:51:12 AM PDT
by
70th Division
(I love my country but fear my government!)
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
If they go through with the rule, I hope Levin wins, but I doubt he will.
33
posted on
03/17/2010 10:51:53 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
To: OldDeckHand
34
posted on
03/17/2010 10:55:29 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
To: kingattax
Agreed!
"Now, get out of my court, you moron!" :)
35
posted on
03/17/2010 10:56:56 AM PDT
by
taraytarah
(Victim of massive tagline layoff.)
To: DoughtyOne
Republican and Leadership is an oxymoron.
36
posted on
03/17/2010 10:58:00 AM PDT
by
murron
(Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
To: pabianice
The Court will take the case. It has to. It’s what the Court does with the case that matters.
The real fight on this case is up front, when Levin seeks a preliminary injunction barring the government from implementing any part of this bill. If the government wins the injunction, it then goes into a stall tactic to delay a Court ruling. Say, three or four years. By then, there has been so much bureaucracy built up around the legislation there is no way a court would overturn it. No matter how blatantly unconstitutional it is.
37
posted on
03/17/2010 10:58:17 AM PDT
by
henkster
(A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
To: nutmeg
Big crush on Levin. Smart attorney as compared to Bambi at law. (bet Bambi cheated).
38
posted on
03/17/2010 10:59:25 AM PDT
by
floriduh voter
(Charlie Crist said about the summit, ..."I don't think a lot..." What else is new?)
To: BuckeyeTexan
I think all he would need is to get one House member to sign on with him as client.
To: maeng
40
posted on
03/17/2010 11:01:00 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson