[OldDeckHand]

"What do they need now ? 1 more vote"

Firedoglake, a VERY liberal site, has a good running whip count. It may be found here. It still shows them more than a dozen short, even with Clayburn's latest additions.

[dervish]

thank you for that link

[TomGuy]

Firedoglake, a VERY liberal site, has a good running whip count.

I read some of the comments posted at that link. Even the libs don't seem too happy with this health care bill and it being ramrodded through.

[moose2004]

“Firedoglake, a VERY liberal site, has a good running whip count.” It still shows them more than a dozen short, even with Clayburn’s latest additions.”

Great news, thank you for the info.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Firedoglake, a VERY liberal site, has a good running whip count. It may be found here. It still shows them more than a dozen short, even with Clayburn's latest additions.

I don't know when Clyburn said he had 4 "new" Yes votes (no source link in this thread), but we already knew Altmire and Gordon were Yes votes, so if Clyburn is correct, that's only +2 Yes.

In the meantime, according to NRCC, the number of No votes has increased +2 to 204 No, 188 Yes. If Clyburn is correct and we add his 2 (not 4) new Yes votes. that would be 204 No, 190 Yes, 37 Undecided.

None of these sources are 100% certain, of course.

http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/

http://www.nrcc.org/CodeRed/targets/