Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine
I hate it when people make the case against gay marraige with ridiculous arguments like this. It just looks stupid.

It is not stupid nor ridiculous.

This is exactly where this is headed.

When the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman is discarded, then no one can legally define what marriage is.

ANY restriction on marriage would simply be litigated out of existence, as being none of the state's business.

Hayworth has this one right. Without God's definition of marriage, marriage will cease to have any definition.

The collapse of society is the end result.

47 posted on 03/15/2010 10:17:55 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: exit82; autumnraine; All

Also, show me a past civilization where the sexual perversion of homosexual sex was widely accepted, and I’ll show you the same civilization where bestiality was also widely accepted—it really is a valid slippery-slope argument.

The ancient peoples of Canaan in the bible come to mind. They worshipped brother/sister AND husband/wife gods (yes, the same pair) and lived the same way. Homosexuality, incest and infanticide (call it ancient “abortion”) were a regular part of their lives, along with bestiality, and other disgusting practices. Open the door, and all these evils will come in...

Read Leviticus 18 which lists the sins of the Canaanites—as the list of immoralities which God’s people should never do....

The “lifestyle” of the Canaanites was the reason God commanded that their entire society should be wiped out.


69 posted on 03/15/2010 10:42:50 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson