Skip to comments.
J.D. Hayworth: 'You could marry your horse'
Politico ^
Posted on 03/15/2010 9:57:33 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
J.D. Hayworth: 'You could marry your horse'
By ANDY BARR | 3/15/10 12:07 PM EDT
Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.) said Sunday that the expansion of state laws allowing gay marriage could lead to people marrying horses.
Hayworth, during an interview with an Orlando, Fla., radio station explained: "You see, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, when it started this move toward same-sex marriage, actually defined marriage - now get this - it defined marriage as simply, 'the establishment of intimacy.'"
"Now how dangerous is that?" asked Hayworth, who is challenging Sen. John McCain from the right in Arizona's GOP Senate primary.
"I mean, I don't mean to be absurd about it, but I guess I can make the point of absurdity with an absurd point," he continued. "I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, I guess you could marry your horse."
The former Republican congressman then insisted that the "only way" to prevent men from marrying horses is to create a federal marriage amendment. Hayworth noted that he supports such an amendment.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: animals4romney; arizona; bestiality; culturewar; hayworth; homosexualagenda; jdhayworth; marriage; marriagelaws; mccain; peta; romney; romneymarriage; samesexmarriage; sexpositiveagenda; unbiblicalmarriage; zoophilia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
?
To: Sub-Driver
I hate it when people make the case against gay marraige with ridiculous arguments like this. It just looks stupid.
2
posted on
03/15/2010 9:59:12 AM PDT
by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: Sub-Driver
Better than Adam and Steve
3
posted on
03/15/2010 9:59:24 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Sub-Driver
4
posted on
03/15/2010 9:59:34 AM PDT
by
Reaganesque
("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
To: Sub-Driver
There was probably many common law marriages like this in the 19th century.
5
posted on
03/15/2010 10:00:42 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(November can't come soon enough!)
To: Sub-Driver
“The former Republican congressman then insisted that the “only way” to prevent men from marrying horses is to create a federal marriage amendment.”
Why they gotta rag on “men” all the time? Like there aren’t perverted wimmen out there?
6
posted on
03/15/2010 10:00:43 AM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Everyone hates the U.S. at least until they need liberated.)
To: autumnraine
Well if we let the progressive weenies drive us into shar’ia, it may become a valid argument.
7
posted on
03/15/2010 10:01:00 AM PDT
by
montyspython
("I don't believe in 'no win' scenarios." - James T. Kirk)
To: pissant
“Better than Adam and Steve”
What is?
8
posted on
03/15/2010 10:01:12 AM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Everyone hates the U.S. at least until they need liberated.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hey,many of us Gay Staters are currently very *happily* married to our horses! Mind your own business,Mr Hayworth!
9
posted on
03/15/2010 10:02:21 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
To: Grunthor
10
posted on
03/15/2010 10:02:32 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Sub-Driver
Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.) said Sunday that the expansion of state laws allowing gay marriage could lead to people marrying horses. No way. Jessamine (my Canadian mare) eats too much. Plus, I haven't taught her to poop dollar bills yet.
11
posted on
03/15/2010 10:03:55 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
To: Sub-Driver
Well, I was married to a pig for 12 miserable years...
A horse would probably be an improvement... And if the marriage didn’t work out, I could still use it to pull a plow.
To: autumnraine
No fooling. Stupid and desperate. If that’s the best argument he can come up with, he probably should avoid the subject.
13
posted on
03/15/2010 10:04:51 AM PDT
by
stormer
To: Sub-Driver
"I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, I guess you could marry your horse."
"OK Michelle, that's one stomp for a sugar cube, two stomps for a carrot"
14
posted on
03/15/2010 10:04:54 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
To: LegendHasIt
Or sell it to the glue factory
15
posted on
03/15/2010 10:05:15 AM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Grunthor
16
posted on
03/15/2010 10:06:15 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: Sub-Driver
Hayworth has his facts wrong. The courts in didn’t inflict “gay” “marriage” on the people of Massachusetts. The Governor, Mitt Romney, did.
17
posted on
03/15/2010 10:06:17 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(The Republican Party is to conservatism what Twinkies are to nutrition.)
To: Grunthor
Why they gotta rag on “men” all the time? Like there aren’t perverted wimmen out there?
No, I ran a classified ad for years trying to find one and never got a response.
18
posted on
03/15/2010 10:06:26 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
To: Noumenon
Still wouldn’t make up for what you spend to keep her. Better work on $20’s.
To: Sub-Driver
Now, now J.D. McCain will come out and accuse you of hating women! His lovely wife and daughter are ALL about gay marriage.
20
posted on
03/15/2010 10:06:43 AM PDT
by
AuntB
(WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson