Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Hanks: Overcoming Racism Taking “Awfully Long Time” and Calls WWII a War of “Racism and Terror”
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | Michael van der Galien

Posted on 03/15/2010 9:50:51 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Dr. Ursus

Both of their souls are owned by satan... hanks is an unAmerican idiot... with a bad hair piece.

LLS


41 posted on 03/15/2010 10:35:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Wolverine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

He is an actor. I wish these clowns would just accept the fact that they are just an actor or actress-nothing else! However, worse than an actor or actress are members of the public that give them a soap box and a hearing.


42 posted on 03/15/2010 10:37:15 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68
His only impressive acting was Forest Gump... and he was not acting!

LLS

43 posted on 03/15/2010 10:37:42 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Wolverine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

Tom Hanks lifted his thesis from a fairly accurate 1986 book by historian John Dower.

The book, titled War Without Mercy, Race and Power in the Pacific does confirm the use of “race” on both the Allied and Axis sides of the war. Japanese were routinely characterized as nearsighted, monkey like people. Japanese seemed to see themselves as taller and better looking (and lighter skinned) than Koreans and Chinese.
A google search will turn up hundreds of WW II era cartoons that confirm this.

The trouble I have with Hanks’s statement is, why now ?
Is the statement really needed to bump interest in the series ?


44 posted on 03/15/2010 10:39:01 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

I had a great friend that survived the Batan Death March... the Japanese (he called them Japs) were animals of satan.

LLS


45 posted on 03/15/2010 10:39:06 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Wolverine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: laxcoach

It is hysterical the self-importance said comedian in drag turned movie guy has. He doesn’t need to be super smart to do that, just pretend to be other people really well. I attribute no great intelligence to anyone who can act. Especially when he’s saying what he’s saying aboout WWII? Insane.


46 posted on 03/15/2010 10:39:12 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ReneeLynn

Agreed about his “deep thoughts”.

What I meant was that in order to navigate the shark infested waters of entertainment, he has to have some intelligence. Also, he has produced quite a few projects which involves more intellectual work than acting.

He’s definitely and ignorant loon.


47 posted on 03/15/2010 10:42:45 AM PDT by laxcoach (Government is greedy. Taxpayers who want their own money are not greedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Michael van der Galien

I suggest vthat Mr. Hanks watch the documentary about the Rape of Nanking. In that case and others, it was the Japanese who implemented racist policies.


49 posted on 03/15/2010 10:46:56 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I watched the first episode of “Pacific” last night. I enjoyed it, but was a bit annoyed at the portrayal of an officer (USMC Capt.) who was over-the-top gung ho and racist. Of course, when the battle started, he was paralyzed with fear in a fox hole. Yeah…that’s how it really works…
50 posted on 03/15/2010 10:48:55 AM PDT by TankerKC ("...wankerKC..." --agromination March 11, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Seriously, what’s wrong with that guy?

The basic problem is that he thinks that because he's made a couple of war movies (as actor/co-producer), he's some kind of historian. He's got more money than brains. Not an uncommon character trait in Hollywood.
51 posted on 03/15/2010 10:50:24 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

Dower’s 1999 book, “Embracing Defeat” also touches on the racial aspect that the Allies employed in the war and how quickly this evaporated once the US took control of Japan via the Occupation.
MacArthur got rid of any Occupation officer who could not get past the old animus.


52 posted on 03/15/2010 10:52:52 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: laxcoach

These people are so isolated in Hollywood that what they say to their friends seems normal and right to them. I was stuck by that when I caught a red carpet interview with Cameron Diaz and she said what a nice opportunity the Oscars were for ‘the community’ to get together and see each other. It just struck me that these people think of their group as a land unto itself with only each other for neighbors. They’re ‘apart’ from the rest of us. That cannot lead to good things. Obviously.


53 posted on 03/15/2010 10:53:05 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: laxcoach

You may be right. But if I go and I’m wrong (i.e., I end up thinking it’s not worth it), I probably can’t get my money back from James Cameron, and I’d be just sick over it.


54 posted on 03/15/2010 10:54:54 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

This guy seems to be looking at history through politically correct lenses.


55 posted on 03/15/2010 10:55:31 AM PDT by Catholic Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

My father-in-law, as a young Filipino child during WW2, was hung by his ankles and beaten unconscious in an attempt to get information out of him - info he didn’t have to give.

I guess it would shock Tom Hanks to learn it was the JAPANESE who did this to him, and not imperialistic Americans!


56 posted on 03/15/2010 10:55:33 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

My dad was on an carrier during WWII, also had uncles in the Pacific and Europe. But one thing comes to mind about “the bombs” being dropped on Japan is General MacArthur warned the President that an invasion of Japan would cost the Military with about two million men in casualties and deaths. That is 2,000,000. This was forewarned at the taking of Iwo Jima. You can not put into words how difficult it would have been in an invasion of Japan itself.


57 posted on 03/15/2010 10:55:57 AM PDT by OldBullrider (if yur hurt, rub some dirt on it, and get back to work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Bingo!


58 posted on 03/15/2010 10:58:10 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Barack Obama is Osama bin Laden's relief pitcher.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

The Hollywood in-crowd has finally gotten to Hanks — I knew it was only a matter of time.


59 posted on 03/15/2010 10:59:47 AM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chimera
I wonder if Hanks would consider that "racism" by the other side

I'll bet he wouldn't. Guys like Hanks live in a dreamworld. A certain amount of time in an industry that deals in fantasy has it's effect on the mental facilities. First of all he's not an educated guy either formally or in any other sense. He's not well read in all likelihood. He has just a little knowledge which we all know is a very dangerous thing. He's so rich and full of himself that he plays by his own rules. He only goes on shows where people agree with him. And the people who interview him are just as big of dimwits as he is. He doesn't debate because he'd lose badly. In an article published recently Victor Davis Hanson absolutely destroys Tom Hanks. Will that matter? Not likely. Those who listen to and believe Tom Hanks don't know who Victor Davis Hanson is and don't read much more than the funny papers.
60 posted on 03/15/2010 11:01:57 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson