DNA is just like fingerprints. Same thing, and this hysteria over DNA is like little old ladies worried that a camera can suck your spirit by taking a picture.
It’s an advanced identification tool. Deal with it.
I also think they shouldn’t be allowed to keep fingerprints after a case is dismissed or a person is found not guilty; or else the fingerprints should be filed with the evidence in the case, and not accessable without a search warrant.
If the cops can’t just randomly collect all our fingerprints and store them, they shouldn’t be allowed to get our fingerprints under the guise of an arrest.
Plus, DNA is much more than fingerprints. It can be used for esxample in to determine paternity, and to find genetic markers for diseases and health risks — something insurance companies would love to get hold of.
It might be a good idea to do some studying before entering this debate.