Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO needs an anti-missile defence system
AFP via Google ^ | 3/12/2010 | AFP via Google

Posted on 03/12/2010 11:14:38 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

NATO needs to develop an anti-missile defence system as a deterrence, the alliance chief said Friday, while seeking to assure Moscow that the organisation posed no threat to Russia.

"We must develop an effective missile defence," NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told an international conference in the Polish capital.

"In the coming years we will probably face many more countries and possibly even some non-state actors armed with long-range missiles and nuclear capabilities," he said.

Rasmussen also insisted later during a press conference that "a nuclear capability will remain an essential part of a credible deterrence in the future."

"I share the great vision of a world free of nuclear weapons.

"But as long as we do have nuclear weapons on earth and as long as we know there are countries and non-state actors that aspire to acquire such nuclear capacities, I think we should have a nuclear capacity as part of our deterrent policy."

Rasmussen told the conference that a system for protection against missiles should be part of NATO's policy of deterring threats.

"Deterrence works against rational actors but not all actors that we will have to deal with in the future will be rational.

"That's why deterrence and defence need to go together and why we have the obligation to look into the missile defence options," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: antimissile; bmd; deterrence; missiledefense; missileshield; nato; russia

1 posted on 03/12/2010 11:14:39 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Europe won’t spend the money and doesn’t have the tech either


2 posted on 03/12/2010 11:19:45 PM PST by STD (-Obama Comes, Riding The Pale Horse of Islam, Next Comes the Red Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

EU has a bigger GDP than America so let’s at least split it 50-50. No more freeloading euroweenies, we’re tired of paying for your defense and especially tired of not being thanked for it.


3 posted on 03/12/2010 11:20:34 PM PST by mainsail that
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

Eastern Europe will spend the money.


4 posted on 03/12/2010 11:20:37 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mainsail that

What exactly is the function of NATO these days?


5 posted on 03/12/2010 11:22:07 PM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Russia would probably pull a Georgia on its former satellites one by one, starting with the Baltic countries. So NATO is needed, but everyone must put the same share of GDP in defense one way or another


6 posted on 03/12/2010 11:27:02 PM PST by mainsail that
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

NATO needs an antimissile system.... AGAINST RUSSIA!!!!!


7 posted on 03/12/2010 11:33:20 PM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


8 posted on 03/12/2010 11:36:03 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


9 posted on 03/12/2010 11:42:49 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

You mean a ridiculous “Star Wars” system (Dead Ted Kennedy) that is “unproven” (brain dead Baraq 0bama) ?


10 posted on 03/12/2010 11:43:08 PM PST by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

All distractions should be halted...Stop
All crap from the the left sho......Stop
The bastard tried to to choke.......Stop
The Marxist are playing the game....Stop

America is quite pissed and there is no stop.


11 posted on 03/12/2010 11:52:19 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

The question should be how do we use France as a missile shield...?


12 posted on 03/13/2010 1:15:35 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper (Next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

I think that we should kick out France out of NATO and let them fend for themselves.


13 posted on 03/13/2010 1:16:48 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Frak NATO and the Euro-trash; let the loud mouths fend for themselves. So either put the missiles in France or let the Euro-bitches manage their own problems!


14 posted on 03/13/2010 1:44:23 AM PST by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson