Posted on 03/12/2010 5:29:24 PM PST by molybdenum
LOL I can’t figure out why you keep arguing things I have not said. Apparently you just want to pick a fight. I have no idea why. Have I irritated you on another thread? I rarely pay attention to people’s names here, so I may well have. If so, get over it.
So Ok, I'm supposed to not answer that???? Have a nice Saturday. Bye.
My response that it wouldn’t mean he was a saved Christian because he says, “Talent on loan from God” what simply a response. You did not come back to me with any sort of explanation of why you thought my response was incorrect, instead you just posted a big sigh. I’m sorry your debate skills are under par, but really, it’s a tough world out here on the internet.
I’m actually surprised that apparently my answer to your post got you that upset. I really have no idea what set you off. I certainly did not have that in mind.
You just never know...
I'm thinking maybe there are more 'peaceful' ones anti-jihad, and the MSM will not give them airtime.
As some people here are aware my debate skills are superb. To me what you said was not worth debating. Thanks again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It could just be that they are afraid of offending their bosses--or they may have been told what to say. IIRC, Arab interests have a significant ownership stake in Fox News Channel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was not aware that Glen Beck was a Christian. Where did you hear that?
I think that you are using the term “fascist” in a very sloppy manner. I can assure you that the last thing on earth that the real fascists in the 1930s and 1940s wanted was to pressure their minority populations into assimilating into Western society and accepting Western values like freedom of speech, women’s rights, non-violent debate, etc. And they certainly didn’t support the Jews like Wilders does. Real fascists also do not support smaller government, less taxes, greater economic independence for businesses, and more power to the regular people rather than the government. To the contrary, fascists believe in total government control of both business and the people. If you apply the term fascist to people who have almost nothing in common with the original fascists, then you devalue the word and make it merely a meaningless slander.
In my opinion, Wilders is the best hope for a Europe that is neither Islamic nor neo-Nazi. He is the most moderate of all the major European politicians who openly oppose the impending Islamification of Europe. Most of the Eastern European Nationalist parties are neo-Nazi or, at the very least, anti-Semitic in orientation. Le Pen’s National Front in France and the Vlaams Belang Flemish Nationalist Party in Belgium are somewhat more moderate, but even they have some members with ties to neo-Nazis, even though Vlaams Belang is a strong supporter of Israel. I don’t believe that Pia Kjaersgaard’s Danish People’s Party has been connected in any way with Nazism, but that party is really what we would consider left-wing in the U.S. No, Wilders may not be perfect, but he’s far better than the alternatives.
I don’t believe that demographers are wrong when they say that Europe will likely become majority Muslim this century. Can you imagine how disatrous that might be? What if the Muslims try to destroy Israel again, but this time several European nations are fighting on their side? That might even spell the start of World War III, this time with several nuclear powers. Even if nothing like were to happen, though, something needs to be done to stop Europe’s Islamization, even if just for human and women’s rights reasons.
If you have to tell me your debate skills are superb. Well....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.