Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
From the article: "Look, I was pro-choice. I am pro-life. You can go back to YouTube and look at what I said in 1994. I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice. I changed my position. And I get tired of people that are holier-than-thou because they've been pro-life longer than I have," he said then.

OK, let's go back, Mitt, what did you say, after all?

"I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time when my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years that we should sustain and support it, and I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice." (October, 1994 Senatorial debate vs. Ted Kennedy)

Now when an upstanding Mormon uses the term "sustain" he is using one of the most serious & solemn words of support that is even contained in the normal "currency" within the Lds vocabulary. Note this comment from a Mormon who actaully took issue with Mitt's past commitment to abortion:

”In the LDS context 'sustain' has a very special meaning. Whenever someone in a congregation gets a new responsibility (a calling), their names are presented in our sacrament meeting along with what they are being asked to do. This is usually presented to the congregation by a member of the local leadership as follows: 'Brother Jones has been asked to serve as the 15 and 16 year-old Sunday School teacher. All that can sustain him in this calling please show by the uplifted hand.' At this point members of the congregation who sustain the calling raise their right hand. The leader than says 'any opposed may manifest it', and anyone who opposes the calling may raise their hand. To me this is one of the greatest things about the Mormon experience, that when we are asked to do something in our local congregation, we can look around us and see that the people around us know what we are being asked to do, and are showing a willingness to help and support us. It is an exceptional sense of community, especially considering that at the local and regional levels there is no paid clergy. Since as a rule everyone has some responsibility in the congregation, and those responsibilities change sometimes every 2-3 years, sometimes more frequently, there is a very egalitarian aspect to how local congregations are run. We are also taught that once we sustain someone we should do all we can to help someone in their calling, and not needlessly tear them down....Everyone in the Church from the highest ranked ecclesiastical official on down, is supported by a sustaining...Current president of the Church Gordon B. Hinckley said: “The procedure of sustaining is much more than a ritualistic raising of the hand. It is a commitment to uphold, to support, to assist those who have been selected” -Ensign, May 1995, p. 51 ...We take the same approach to sustaining other things, such as the law of the land. Our 12th Article of Faith says that we are to sustain the law. What does this mean? The best explanation I have found is when past President of the LDS Church David O. McKay said: “To sustain the law, therefore, is to refrain from saying or doing anything which will weaken it or make it ineffective” -Conference Report, Apr. 1937, p. 28 When we sustain someone or something, and especially when we make that sustaining an overt public act, we take on very specific responsibilities. Support, strength, assistance even when we might personally disagree with something in the person or thing, are all things required of us in 'sustaining'. When Mitt Romney was an LDS bishop he was in charge of the sustaining process every Sunday. On Sundays he didn't officiate in the process, the process was still done under his very close oversight. The LDS concept of 'sustaining' can't be far from his mind when he makes statements saying he 'sustains' a law..." Source: http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2006/12/mormons-against-romney-analyze-romneys.html

From the article: "...he can't resist insulting people's intelligence about his past record when discussing his current position," Antle writes.

Exactly right. Mitt even attended a Planned Parenthood party when he ran for Senate vs. Kennedy in the 90s & is on record that he was "pro-choice" going back to when his mother ran for Senate in 1970.

15 posted on 03/12/2010 11:32:47 AM PST by Colofornian (If you're not going to drink the coffee, at least wake up and smell it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian; wagglebee; P-Marlowe; Jim Robinson; pissant

Romney’s pro-abortion position is on a number of articles in the old Romneytruthfile.

There really isn’t much point in discussing this. He was pro-abortion, and he’s come to realize that he will lose the conservative base with that position.

His problem is the chameleon-like nature of all his position.

He shifts with every wind of politics.


19 posted on 03/12/2010 11:37:09 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

And I get tired of people that are holier-than-thou because they’ve been pro-life longer than I have,” he said then.
______________________________________________

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Romney is a hater...

He’s Anti-Nana...

He’s a Nana Basher...


114 posted on 03/12/2010 7:09:18 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson