Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob
John, If the Slaughter gambit were played, would not the more pertinent question brought to SCOTUS be on:

Section 7. Clause 1 "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills... Clause 2 Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States;... But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively" With the Slaughter trick, they will have not satisfied several of these constitutional requirements to provide a passed bill to the president. Mark Levin went on a tear on this yesterday.

38 posted on 03/12/2010 11:09:53 AM PST by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Uncledave
That's why I referenced violation of Article !, Section 7, US Constitution in the article itself.

John / Billybob

41 posted on 03/12/2010 11:23:07 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.TheseAretheTimes.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson