[Congressman Billybob]

Any Member of the House or Senate would have standing to file a case saying that a supposed “law,” which they opposed, was “passed” in violation of both the Constitution and the Rules of their House.

Standing will not be a problem in this case.

John / Billybob

[Hawthorn]

>> Standing will not be a problem in this case. <<

Will take your word for it!

But I guess any judicial action would have to wait until after some “law” is actually “passed” and presented to the TØTUS for signature.

Or do you think there might be any federal judge(s) in DC who’d be willing to assert jurisdiction and issue an emergency injunction as soon as Madame Slaughter’s illegal monstrosity should issue forth from the Rules Committee?

[stephenjohnbanker]

“Any Member of the House or Senate would have standing to file a case saying that a supposed “law,” which they opposed, was “passed” in violation of both the Constitution and the Rules of their House.

Standing will not be a problem in this case.

John / Billybob “

That is a relief. Thank you for this information.