Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn
Any Member of the House or Senate would have standing to file a case saying that a supposed “law,” which they opposed, was “passed” in violation of both the Constitution and the Rules of their House.

Standing will not be a problem in this case.

John / Billybob

29 posted on 03/12/2010 10:28:26 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.TheseAretheTimes.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

>> Standing will not be a problem in this case. <<

Will take your word for it!

But I guess any judicial action would have to wait until after some “law” is actually “passed” and presented to the TØTUS for signature.

Or do you think there might be any federal judge(s) in DC who’d be willing to assert jurisdiction and issue an emergency injunction as soon as Madame Slaughter’s illegal monstrosity should issue forth from the Rules Committee?


44 posted on 03/12/2010 12:25:01 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

“Any Member of the House or Senate would have standing to file a case saying that a supposed “law,” which they opposed, was “passed” in violation of both the Constitution and the Rules of their House.

Standing will not be a problem in this case.

John / Billybob “

That is a relief. Thank you for this information.


49 posted on 03/12/2010 2:06:10 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson