Lucky? I don’t think luck has anything to do with it. Her actions are calculated. She’s a purposeful distraction from Obama’s agenda. She’s single-handedly destroyed any chance that those behind the eligibility movement had to get to the truth. She picked her target and polarized it. Questioning Obama’s eligibility is politically untouchable for conservatives.
Have you noticed that people more openly pro-life and pro-religion also tend to be more critical of Obama’s invisible BC? Thinking in “black and white”, which I respect.
I was being sarcastic. Her function, like Berg’s, is to co-opt the issue and drive it over a cliff. That’s as obvious as the fact that Zero has more to hide than we can possibly fathom.