Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

There was no call for any sort of violence against anyone in that posting. Read it more carefully: PICTURES of the kids, and PICTURES of (unrelated) victims of violence, sent to an adult.

While it’s stupid, crude, rude and vulgar, it is most definitely NOT a call for an assault on anyone.


157 posted on 03/11/2010 1:50:53 PM PST by Don W (I only keep certain folks' numbers in my 'phone so I know NOT to answer when they call)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Don W

Now for some Democrat “threat humor”, coming up.


160 posted on 03/11/2010 1:58:26 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (ONLINE TAX REVOLT 150,000 AND GROWING. http://www.onlinetaxrevolt.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Don W; faq

Maybe not a call for an assault, but clearly threatening nonetheless.

The first paragraph describes that pretty much the toughest folks in the world (patriots constitutionalists and marines) are subject to persuasion through enlightened self interest. So certainly a weenie judge is also subject to this type of persuasion.

The second paragraph outlines the type of persuasion the author thinks might kick in that sense of enlightened self interest for the judge in question(seeing pix of your kids juxtaposed with pix of the murdered and mutilated). The phrase ‘yeah, that should do it’ is exactly referring to the kicking in of enlightened self interest.

So, no direct call for violence. But well beyond stupid rude and vulgar. It crossed that line by including the judge’s kids.


162 posted on 03/11/2010 1:59:34 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson