Thanks for pinging. I always wonder whether my explanations are clear enough and effective. I welcome any input that will help me make it the best it can be.
Especially if people who are interested but haven’t followed the story have any suggestions for how I can make it clearer, that would be greatly appreciated. Those are the people we have to reach. We need to be able to say it in a way they can understand. I’ve tried to use the main “Red Flags” article as something people can understand without diving into all the ins and outs but I wonder if it’s understandable to people who come in brand new.
I had my sister and a couple of friends read it shortly after I posted it and they said they had a hard time keeping track of the names and departments. I’m not sure how to make it clearer without making it a LOT longer - longer than most people would be willing to read.
What you mention in this post is why you don’t see this story get picked up the press (hope you’re reading this Miss Tickly!) and why conservative talk radio hasn’t got too involved either. You have to really study the laws, the people and comprehend a lot of details. It’s not rocket science, of course, but it’s too complicated for a general audience. Overall, though, I think you’ve done as good a job as anyone else I’ve seen, given the complexities and cast of characters.