Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France vows retaliation against US in air tanker dispute
The Telegraph ^ | 3/10/2010 | Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Posted on 03/10/2010 6:26:48 PM PST by bruinbirdman

France has vowed to retaliate against the United States for allegedly shutting Europe's aviation giant EADS out of a $50bn (£33.4bn) defence contract, warning of potential damage to the Atlantic alliance.

"This is a serious affair," said France's Europe minister Pierre Lellouche. "I can assure you that there will be consequences."

"You cannot expect Europeans to contribute to global defence if you deny their industries the right to work on both sides of the Atlantic," he said, adding that French president Nicolas Sarkozy would take action "at the appropriate time".


An Airbus A330 MRTT performing a refueling operation with the Spanish Air Force

The escalating spat comes after EADS withdrew this week from a joint bid with Northrop Grumman to supply the Pentagon with A330 air refuelling tankers, alleging that the procurement terms had been rigged to favour Boeing.

EADS had already won the contract before, offering a larger and more efficient aircraft than Boeing's 767, which is based on technology dating back to the early 1980s. The original deal was struck down after an appeal by Boeing.

Defence disputes fall outside the ambit of the World Trade Organization so Paris is looking at other ways to strike back. "It is obvious that if we roll over and do nothing after a fait accompli by the Pentagon, it is the end of Europe's credibility," said Mr Lellouche.

Rainer Brüderle, Germany's economy minister, has also expressed outrage, alleging that the tender "had clearly been designed to favour Boeing under political pressure."

Joachim Pfeiffer, Bundestag spokesman for the Christian Democrats, said the Pentagon's conduct was "scandalous", a sentiment echoed by a string of politicians on Wednesday.

The dispute casts a cloud over EADS ambitions to become a major player in the US and may have larger strategic

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eads; france; riggedbid; tanker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2010 6:26:48 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

France will surrender soon...


2 posted on 03/10/2010 6:29:56 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Did we say anything when France sold mistral-class warships to russia? Not really.


3 posted on 03/10/2010 6:30:04 PM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


4 posted on 03/10/2010 6:30:14 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

No more photos of Mrs Sarko?


5 posted on 03/10/2010 6:31:21 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama
Defence disputes fall outside the ambit of the World Trade Organization so Paris is looking at other ways to strike back.

Important to keep in mind, before the yahoos get hold of this story.

6 posted on 03/10/2010 6:32:44 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one

And did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?


7 posted on 03/10/2010 6:40:07 PM PST by JRios1968 (The real first rule of Fight Club: don't invite Chuck Norris...EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“expect Europeans to fund global defense”? Don’t make me laugh. The reason they can afford their socialism, besides smaller and formerly relatively homogenous nations, is the “great satan” America’s defense umbrella.


8 posted on 03/10/2010 6:43:37 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The French will sell no more Chateau Sloshy-Foame’ wine to the U.S. in retaliation.


9 posted on 03/10/2010 6:46:28 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

OK, how about when they announced their intention to sell Mistral class warships to Russia? better?


10 posted on 03/10/2010 6:47:19 PM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"This is a serious affair," said France's Europe minister Pierre Lellouche. "I can assure you that there will be consequences."

And these are the folks we were to trust building our military equipment to? If that's the standard, we might as well buy from Venzuela. At least Hugo's rhetoric is more bombastic and entertaining.

11 posted on 03/10/2010 6:50:52 PM PST by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Oh, no! It’s the French!


12 posted on 03/10/2010 6:58:36 PM PST by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

take yo plane and shove it!
furthermore I expect nothing from you that isn’t self serving!
all of the above is based on historical perspective and a keen assessment of current events!


13 posted on 03/10/2010 7:06:20 PM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

14 posted on 03/10/2010 7:13:11 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
"...EADS had already won the contract before, offering a larger and more efficient aircraft than Boeing's 767, which is based on technology dating back to the early 1980s..."

Maybe. But at least the vertical stabilizer isn't likely to be the thing to take down a Boeing tanker. If that is 21st century technology, I'll stick with the 80's technology.

15 posted on 03/10/2010 7:16:10 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
.. Didn't we already do one Marshall plan for the frogs.
16 posted on 03/10/2010 7:16:54 PM PST by Waverunner ( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Exactly. Yet our socialists can’t figure that out and think we can pay for both.

Rather, we’ll run out of other people’s money to spend twice as fast...


17 posted on 03/10/2010 7:17:04 PM PST by Darth Tokarev (Liberalism: Using intellectualism to justify moral cowardice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner

I got yer Marshall Plan right here...!


18 posted on 03/10/2010 7:19:21 PM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“...larger and more efficient...”

Larger = fewer fields from which it can operate

More efficient = well, as a pilot, I want to be the controller of the plane, not a voting member (as in over the Atlantic in a thunderstorm).

I don’t want my flight controls limited close to the ground (almost creating a crash as can be seen on readily available videos of an scairbus almost crashing cue to crosswind gusts).


19 posted on 03/10/2010 7:21:03 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waverunner
Nice reply, ;-)

Just shows you gotta be careful out there. Those legs look like they could injure one if one is not careful.

20 posted on 03/10/2010 7:29:42 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson