Posted on 03/10/2010 6:18:25 PM PST by GVnana
And there you have it.
I will not vote for that leftist Romney.
Tells me all I need to know about Romney. Well, that and the fact he's from Massachusetts.
How many did he buy?
So that is your new Romneybot argument? You nobly beseech me to let Mitt Romney run his campaign for President without opposition to his expensive, well financed, repackaging strategy, because then I could not support Governor Palin?
I contend that I can be against Mitt Romney and for Governor Palin simultaneously, do you think that is possible?
I know that as an old romneybot you are concerned about me overstretching myself because posting something negative on one thread and then posting something positive on another thread is so taxing to the human body, but I'm willing to risk it to get the truth out about both of these candidates.
Wow, that was a heck of a summary, you have a talent and memory.
I would like to see one of our writers or you, turn that into a one page, concrete summary with (links) like wiki does, that we could use for emails and as an anchor for threads and forums, but as short and clean (uncluttered)as possible.
HUH! Romney isn't good at that at all, he doesn't even do that, Romney still comes off as a liberal, with his several months of creating the myth that "Reagan was adamantly pro-choice", or in the debates refusing to renounce his desire to homosexualize the military, his continuing use of illegal aliens while campaigning for the presidency and being exposed for it twice because of his 10 year record of using them.
You made that up, little romneybot.
I’m assuming he did buy a significant number.
#1 on a best seller list? It just doesn’t add up.
Romney wasn’t drawing flies in the 2008 election primary. Any reasonable person would have dropped out early, but because he was self financed he stayed in the race longer, making it look like he was a more serious candidate than he ways.
And now we’re supposed to believe there are hoardes of people willing pay good money for what is essentialy a campagian promo piece?
Like I said, the numbers don’t add up.
“You made that up”
Wrong. Check the transcript of his interview with Chris Wallace last Sunday. Then please point out to me another instance of a republican defending the sanctity of life on national television.
Your big justification for that stupid statement is that Romney was on a Sunday show last weekend?
HUH! Romney isn't good at that at all, he doesn't even do that, Romney still comes off as a liberal, with his several months of creating the myth that "Reagan was adamantly pro-choice", or in the debates refusing to renounce his desire to homosexualize the military, his continuing use of illegal aliens while campaigning for the presidency and being exposed for it twice because of his 10 year record of using them.
You made that up, little romneybot.
No. That was just a recent example that can be easily verified.
You can't explain that statement can you, tell us about the last few years of what Romney has done to sell the conservative message and undo the great damage that he has done all of his life by pushing anti-conservatism.
I agree.
didn’t read it. condense your point to a couple of sentences please.
My reason is that when a fetus is able to survive on it’s own outside the mother’s body, it becomes an independent living person and therefore should have the same protections as any other living human being.
When the fetus can not survive outside the mother’s body regardless of all the help modern science can deliver, it is part and parcel of the mother’s body and she should have the right to decide whether to abort or not. It is no different than her arm or leg or her uterus, all of which can not survive on their own outside her body.
A late term abortion is therefore different than very early abortion. Even in cases of violent rape and forced pregnancy on minor children via incest, it is not right to abort a fetus which has developed to the point it can survive independently.
Huge difference between a tissue mass which can survive as a independent human being outside mother’s body and another tissue mass which is impossible to live outside the mother’s body.
My sperms are also a tissue mass...very much living tissue but does not qualify as an independent human being.
But if she comes in when she is only three months pregnant she can just purge herself of this unwanted tissue mass like having a mole removed. At what time, and we need to know to the minute, is the cutoff between wart removal and murder?
This will also answer lots of people's questions about when the divine soul created in the image of God enters this useless tissue mass and makes it a human with the God given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I'm glad this question is not above your pay grade.
I already did: it was in BLUE font.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.