Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Just another whiny liberal claiming victimization
NJ.com ^ | 3/9/10 | Paul Mulshine

Posted on 03/09/2010 9:17:09 PM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Onerom99

Hello Rino lover Onerom99. How’s Rudy?


21 posted on 03/09/2010 9:41:06 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Of course you don’t need to read.


22 posted on 03/09/2010 9:41:17 PM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant
She argues that the many wannabe conservatives...

Here we go again with Paul Mulshine's version of no true Scotsman. This is starting to get get really old, and really annoying.

23 posted on 03/09/2010 9:45:17 PM PST by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

You didn’t miss anything...reads like a high school essay.


24 posted on 03/09/2010 9:46:07 PM PST by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
Does PDS refer to the liberal nuthuggers who can’t stand her or the irrational conservatives who continue to ignore her faults and lack of qualifications to be CIC?

Here is one of those "irrational conservatives".

Sarah Palin IS this Tea Partier's cup of Tea!! 12/02/2009 | Jim Robinson

Being as how I'm a God, Country, Family, small government, traditional American values, Life & Liberty patriotic kind of guy, Sarah Palin IS my cup of tea. My cup runneth over!
I pray she runs.
Posted on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:02:15 PM by Jim Robinson

25 posted on 03/09/2010 9:47:27 PM PST by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Paul Mulshine is also a self-described conservative who said of himself “why, as a conservative, I am appalled by the conduct of the people at Fox”. Paul Mulshine: article titled “Fox News really isn’t conservative”. Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. October 14, 2006.

Mark Levin: Paul Mulshine is a jackass


26 posted on 03/09/2010 9:48:42 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Imagine for just a second that the late William F. Buckley had been interviewed by Couric. Is there the slightest chance that Buckley would have come out second best?

If Buckley had allowed Couric to tape 3-4 hours of conversations in several different sessions, and then edit them down to twenty-five minutes without any input from him, then yes, he could have been portrayed in a less than flattering light.

Those interviews were not live. They were edited down from a much larger amount of material, and the editors had total control of clip selection, sequence and context, and what to include and exclude. Almost none of the posters on this board who have been incessantly blathering about this have done so honestly.

Bottom line, it was a mistake to do any interviews with hostile interviewers which weren't live. Palin did not want to do them but was pressured, and to a degree deceived by her handlers into doing them. The end result was that Palin didn't come across well, but the blame lies also with her handlers.

27 posted on 03/09/2010 9:50:46 PM PST by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

Conventional wisdom was against David who became King of Israel. We don’t choose. I won’t now.


28 posted on 03/09/2010 9:51:09 PM PST by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Levin nailed it


29 posted on 03/09/2010 9:55:46 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Wright does a good job of pointing out how Palin invokes the same sense of victimhood ....

Using the oldest rudimentary form of describing a liberal isn't doing this guy any favors. Palin is far from victim status and the left is vitriolic about it. It is quite an open display of projection.

30 posted on 03/09/2010 9:56:24 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Starr

Was just what I was thinking... It’s one thing to cry sexist with no reason, it’s another when the whole liberal establishment comes after you for your conservative beliefs.

Me thinks this fellow has other problems (doubt that being conservative is one of them).


31 posted on 03/09/2010 9:57:04 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

No dumb Sarah Palin-hating blue-gums allowed here.


32 posted on 03/09/2010 10:00:51 PM PST by JApost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

What are we allowed to talk about?


33 posted on 03/09/2010 10:03:51 PM PST by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: donna; Onerom99

You could talk to your new anti Palin buddy about his pro abortion views and how he can’t stand social conservatives and how much he liked Rudy Giuliani.

You sure align yourself with some unusual people donna, I guess white hot hate, fries your brain a little.


34 posted on 03/09/2010 10:08:20 PM PST by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.
Once she hits the wall, like all other women, people won't be quite so tolerant of her empty rhetoric, and all those smitten rightwing men won't be so eager to hand over $395 to hear her recitation of clichés and banalities, while ogling her lovely legs and stiletto heels.

You must be one of those NAGS, (National Association of Gals), Rush talks about because they are so ugly they are jealous of attractive conservatives. Try some makeup...

35 posted on 03/09/2010 10:13:24 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (Jim Bunning we will miss you. Palin/Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
Tell us, which of your favorite potential candidates for 2012 has been CIC of a larger force than Sarah Palin has?

Get back to us when you get a clue.

36 posted on 03/09/2010 10:16:09 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
Mulshine, another milquetoast mediacrat that passes as a Conservative in JerseyStan. Praying to another JerseyStan Conservative idol, the dead and hopefully soon forgotten William F. Buckley...and then the prick can't wait to cast blame on Palin as a whiner. If you want some WorldClass whining, do a little background on Mulshine as well as the whole Buckley Clan, another bunch of snobbish/elitist/pansey faux Conservative, very similar to the GHWBush clan. The Buckley Disease that was the wet dream of the Eastern Possevelt ‘WmFBastard’ Conservatives. The Buckleys all need to be devolved into a has been source of Con thought, they are now moderately passable novelist...I am Not A Fan of Buckley nor the Neo-WmFBastards, Brooks, Frum, Chrissy Buckley, ConorFriggenborg etc., etc. Check around the InnerTubes and you will find that there are a lot of Cons that have never been enamored by the WmFB straphangers...get a JOB and do your own research! If not now, then when?
37 posted on 03/09/2010 10:26:12 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99
Pray tell, who on your list of favorite candidates has the qualifications to be CIC? Come on, we want to know. Clock is ticking and were waiting for you to show your true colors.
38 posted on 03/09/2010 10:30:59 PM PST by NavyCanDo (Palin 2012 Teleprompter Not Required)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

I agree 100%.. I’m not arguing that he does at all..

But two wrongs don’t make a right.


39 posted on 03/09/2010 10:35:44 PM PST by Onerom99 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Jim is off his rocker on that one. Clearly affected by the right wing version of PDS.


40 posted on 03/09/2010 10:37:52 PM PST by Onerom99 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson