Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin: Just another whiny liberal claiming victimization
NJ.com ^
| 3/9/10
| Paul Mulshine
Posted on 03/09/2010 9:17:09 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Onerom99
Hello Rino lover Onerom99. How’s Rudy?
To: darkangel82
Of course you don’t need to read.
To: pissant
She argues that the many wannabe conservatives...Here we go again with Paul Mulshine's version of no true Scotsman. This is starting to get get really old, and really annoying.
23
posted on
03/09/2010 9:45:17 PM PST
by
csense
To: darkangel82
You didn’t miss anything...reads like a high school essay.
24
posted on
03/09/2010 9:46:07 PM PST
by
roses of sharon
(I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
To: Onerom99
Does PDS refer to the liberal nuthuggers who cant stand her or the irrational conservatives who continue to ignore her faults and lack of qualifications to be CIC? Here is one of those "irrational conservatives".
Sarah Palin IS this Tea Partier's cup of Tea!! 12/02/2009 | Jim Robinson
Being as how I'm a God, Country, Family, small government, traditional American values, Life & Liberty patriotic kind of guy, Sarah Palin IS my cup of tea. My cup runneth over!
I pray she runs.
Posted on Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:02:15 PM by Jim Robinson
25
posted on
03/09/2010 9:47:27 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: pissant
Paul Mulshine is also a self-described conservative who said of himself “why, as a conservative, I am appalled by the conduct of the people at Fox”. Paul Mulshine: article titled “Fox News really isn’t conservative”. Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. October 14, 2006.
Mark Levin: Paul Mulshine is a jackass
26
posted on
03/09/2010 9:48:42 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: pissant
Imagine for just a second that the late William F. Buckley had been interviewed by Couric. Is there the slightest chance that Buckley would have come out second best?If Buckley had allowed Couric to tape 3-4 hours of conversations in several different sessions, and then edit them down to twenty-five minutes without any input from him, then yes, he could have been portrayed in a less than flattering light.
Those interviews were not live. They were edited down from a much larger amount of material, and the editors had total control of clip selection, sequence and context, and what to include and exclude. Almost none of the posters on this board who have been incessantly blathering about this have done so honestly.
Bottom line, it was a mistake to do any interviews with hostile interviewers which weren't live. Palin did not want to do them but was pressured, and to a degree deceived by her handlers into doing them. The end result was that Palin didn't come across well, but the blame lies also with her handlers.
To: Altura Ct.
Conventional wisdom was against David who became King of Israel. We don’t choose. I won’t now.
28
posted on
03/09/2010 9:51:09 PM PST
by
One Name
To: kcvl
29
posted on
03/09/2010 9:55:46 PM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Wright does a good job of pointing out how Palin invokes the same sense of victimhood ....Using the oldest rudimentary form of describing a liberal isn't doing this guy any favors. Palin is far from victim status and the left is vitriolic about it. It is quite an open display of projection.
30
posted on
03/09/2010 9:56:24 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: Lazarus Starr
Was just what I was thinking... It’s one thing to cry sexist with no reason, it’s another when the whole liberal establishment comes after you for your conservative beliefs.
Me thinks this fellow has other problems (doubt that being conservative is one of them).
31
posted on
03/09/2010 9:57:04 PM PST
by
Deagle
To: Altura Ct.
No dumb Sarah Palin-hating blue-gums allowed here.
32
posted on
03/09/2010 10:00:51 PM PST
by
JApost
To: ansel12
What are we allowed to talk about?
33
posted on
03/09/2010 10:03:51 PM PST
by
donna
(SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
To: donna; Onerom99
You could talk to your new anti Palin buddy about his pro abortion views and how he can’t stand social conservatives and how much he liked Rudy Giuliani.
You sure align yourself with some unusual people donna, I guess white hot hate, fries your brain a little.
34
posted on
03/09/2010 10:08:20 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
To: Altura Ct.
Once she hits the wall, like all other women, people won't be quite so tolerant of her empty rhetoric, and all those smitten rightwing men won't be so eager to hand over $395 to hear her recitation of clichés and banalities, while ogling her lovely legs and stiletto heels.You must be one of those NAGS, (National Association of Gals), Rush talks about because they are so ugly they are jealous of attractive conservatives. Try some makeup...
35
posted on
03/09/2010 10:13:24 PM PST
by
Clint N. Suhks
(Jim Bunning we will miss you. Palin/Cheney 2012)
To: Onerom99
Tell us, which of your favorite potential candidates for 2012 has been CIC of a larger force than Sarah Palin has?
Get back to us when you get a clue.
36
posted on
03/09/2010 10:16:09 PM PST
by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: conservativebuckeye
Mulshine, another milquetoast mediacrat that passes as a Conservative in JerseyStan. Praying to another JerseyStan Conservative idol, the dead and hopefully soon forgotten William F. Buckley...and then the prick can't wait to cast blame on Palin as a whiner. If you want some WorldClass whining, do a little background on Mulshine as well as the whole Buckley Clan, another bunch of snobbish/elitist/pansey faux Conservative, very similar to the GHWBush clan. The Buckley Disease that was the wet dream of the Eastern Possevelt ‘WmFBastard’ Conservatives. The Buckleys all need to be devolved into a has been source of Con thought, they are now moderately passable novelist...I am Not A Fan of Buckley nor the Neo-WmFBastards, Brooks, Frum, Chrissy Buckley, ConorFriggenborg etc., etc. Check around the InnerTubes and you will find that there are a lot of Cons that have never been enamored by the WmFB straphangers...get a JOB and do your own research! If not now, then when?
37
posted on
03/09/2010 10:26:12 PM PST
by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: Onerom99
Pray tell, who on your list of favorite candidates has the qualifications to be CIC? Come on, we want to know. Clock is ticking and were waiting for you to show your true colors.
38
posted on
03/09/2010 10:30:59 PM PST
by
NavyCanDo
(Palin 2012 Teleprompter Not Required)
To: darkangel82
I agree 100%.. I’m not arguing that he does at all..
But two wrongs don’t make a right.
39
posted on
03/09/2010 10:35:44 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
To: ansel12
Jim is off his rocker on that one. Clearly affected by the right wing version of PDS.
40
posted on
03/09/2010 10:37:52 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson