Your contractual agreement may have been nothing more than an options agreement sold by Murdoch to Alwaleed to buy more shares (on the open market) and that is what has happened.
You toss around empty words like you expect them to have meaning to people.
You accuse Murdoch of entering into a contract without specifying the nature, value, duration of such contract. If you expect to be taken seriously, provide some source for your wild accusations.
And while you are on the subject...reliability of source is an important matter for serious people.
All this said, you may be perfectly correct in what you say...but you can't expect for your statements to have weight and be taken seriously unless people are able to evaluate their source (and a poster tossing out opinions on FR is not a source).
I don't think that is too much to ask for.
“Your contractual agreement may have been nothing more than an options...”
Oh its not my contractual agreement now is it?
“You accuse Murdoch of entering into a contract without...”
Man - there is no accusation. I’d call it a fact. I’d also say your face is red, but I’m wondering why you’d be interested in protecting Murdoch? I assure you - he really doesn’t care that you are defending him.
“And while you are on the subject...reliability of source is an important matter for serious people.”
Reliability of source is relative to the listener, is it not? Some may say MSNBC or CNN or even the beloved Foxnews is reliable. Good luck with ALL of the MSM media. It is not news....it is propoganda.
Enough about all this....