Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massa — New conservative media hero
Politico ^ | March 8, 2010 | John Bresnahan

Posted on 03/08/2010 8:49:20 PM PST by Second Amendment First

He’s spent only 431 days in Congress, has never seen any of his bills pass out of subcommittee and was best known for voting against major pieces of legislation because they weren’t liberal enough for him — at least until he was accused of sexually harassing a male staffer.

Meet Eric Massa, conservative media hero.

The New York Democrat’s weekend radio rant against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel has his star rising on the right even as he resigns from Congress under an ethical cloud.

Rush Limbaugh vowed to make a “national story” out of Massa’s claims that Democrats orchestrated his downfall because he voted no on health care reform — adding that Massa is “going to have so much support from people.”

Matt Drudge led his site for much of the day Monday with all-caps links to POLITICO’s coverage of Massa’s statements: “RAHM ‘WOULD SELL HIS OWN MOTHER,’ ‘SON OF THE DEVIL’S SPAWN.’”

And Glenn Beck took to Twitter to announce that he’d have Massa on his show for “the full hour” Tuesday because “all Americans need to hear him.”

Democrats warned that the GOP should be careful about embracing Massa.

“If the stories that are circulating are true about what really happened, the Republicans are going to hold up someone as the cause célèbre who harassed male members of his staff,” said a senior Democratic strategist. “Is that really where they want to be?”

And at least some voices on the right were urging caution, too.

Conservative blogger Michelle Malkin warned her readers not to be fooled by a “weapon of Massa distraction.”

“He’s been a progressive zealot and political opportunist his entire career,” Malkin wrote Monday afternoon. “He’s claimed conspiracy before, is intimately bonded with the nutroots and climbed the political ladder with backing from the odious, anti-war-hoaxer-embracing Gen. Wesley Clark. What Massa dismissively calls his ‘salty old sailor’ talk should raise bright-red flags about possible long-standing predatory behavior.”

Massa downplayed his ethical troubles in a 90-minute interview with radio station WKPQ on Sunday, saying Democratic leaders were using a single comment he made at a wedding reception on New Year’s Eve as a pretext to get him out of the House.

“I danced with the bride, and I danced with the bridesmaid. Absolutely nothing occurred,” Massa recounted. “I said goodnight to the bridesmaid. I sat down at the table where my whole staff was — all of them, by the way, bachelors. One of them looked at me and — as they would do after, I don’t know, 15 gin and tonics and goodness only knows how many bottles of champagne — a staff member made an intonation to me that maybe I should be chasing after the bridesmaid. His points were clear, and his words were far more colorful than that.

“And I grabbed the staff member sitting next to me, and I said, ‘What I really ought to be doing is fracking you,’ and then tousled the guy’s hair and left, went to my room, because I knew the party was getting to a point where I shouldn’t be there.”

Massa said the comment was inappropriate but claimed to be the victim of “political correctness” run amok — all because Democratic leaders want him out of the way.

Massa said the death of Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) and the departure of Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii) have made him “the deciding vote on the health care bill, and this administration and this House leadership have said, quote-unquote, they will stop at nothing to pass this health care bill, and now they’ve gotten rid of me and it will pass. You connect the dots.”

Hoyer’s office dismissed the charge out of hand.

“That’s completely false,” said Katie Grant, a Hoyer spokeswoman. “There is zero merit to that accusation.”

A senior Democratic aide also rejected Massa’s claim that Hoyer acted inappropriately in confirming that he had been told of allegations against the congressman and insisted that they be taken to the House ethics committee.

“Massa’s charges against Hoyer are outrageous and totally false,” said the aide. “Hoyer acted quickly and discreetly because he didn’t know if the allegations were true, but it wasn’t up to him to decide; that’s up to the bipartisan ethics committee. Weeks later, once the allegations were made public and Hoyer was asked directly by the media the extent of his knowledge, he had no choice but to state the limit of his involvement.”

In Massa’s telling, Hoyer’s statement was consistent with a larger Democratic plot to pass health care reform at all costs.

Massa said that Emanuel, who recruited him to run for Congress in 2006 when Emanuel was serving as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, once accosted him at the House gym for not getting in line behind President Barack Obama’s plans.

“I am showering, naked as a jaybird, and here comes Rahm Emanuel, not even with a towel wrapped around his tush, poking his finger in my chest, yelling at me because I wasn’t going to vote for the president’s budget,” Massa said. “Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?”

The White House declined to comment on Massa’s allegations, as did Pelosi’s office.

Massa announced Wednesday that he would retire at the end of his term, citing a cancer scare in December. Massa, a 24-year Navy veteran, survived two previous bouts with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

But POLITICO reported that Massa was the target of a House ethics committee investigation, which began in early February when a former top aide to the New York congressman went to Hoyer’s office, seeking guidance from Democratic leaders on what to do about allegations that Massa had sexually harassed a more junior male aide.

Hoyer told the Massa staffer, Ronald Hikel, that he should report the incident to the ethics committee or Hoyer would himself. Hikel, Massa’s former deputy chief and legislative director, then went to the ethics panel and was twice interviewed by investigators. Joe Racalto and other top Massa aides were also questioned by ethics panel staff several weeks before the POLITICO story broke.

“They brought lawyers in. They took my staff members into a room, and they grilled them for 3½ to four hours,” Massa said during his radio appearance. “And the first question that they asked them was, ‘Do you think Congressman Massa is gay?’ Let me ask you something: So what if I was? ... That’s an issue between me and my wife, and trust me, she knows the answer.”

The ethics committee announced Thursday that it was reviewing the case. And Friday, Massa announced that he would resign his seat effective Monday. The House was out Monday, so it would not have been possible for Massa to formally step aside then.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: massa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2010 8:49:20 PM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Just listening to a little bit of this guy on Fox gets me to believe he has one hell of an eye opening book to write some day. Sooner better than later.
2 posted on 03/08/2010 8:51:28 PM PST by NavyCanDo (Palin 2012 Teleprompter Not Required)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Massa is about as conservative as Anthony Weiner, except Weiner respects the opinions of the majority of his constituents while Massa said he’d vote against his constituent’s wishes. Get in bed with this guy, prepare to come out with more than fleas.


3 posted on 03/08/2010 8:54:04 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
“I am showering, naked as a jaybird, and here comes Rahm Emanuel, not even with a towel wrapped around his tush, poking his finger in my chest, yelling at me because I wasn’t going to vote for the president’s budget,” Massa said.

Hey Massa, that wasn't Rahm's finger he was poking you in the chest with.

4 posted on 03/08/2010 8:54:47 PM PST by mlocher (USA is a sovereign nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Thanks for talking teh libs talking points and running with them. Politico should be asking if the Obama Admin intimidates then smears Congressman for not supporting ObamaCare instead of their libe spin that Massa is a friend of Conservatives. The left always turns it around.


5 posted on 03/08/2010 8:56:03 PM PST by Frantzie (TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

So why resign. If it was a bulshit accusation. And who will be replacing him. When?


6 posted on 03/08/2010 8:58:17 PM PST by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Politico is just lamenting that they do not have a libtard/progressive hero of their own...opps, my bad, they do: Barack Hussein Obama, aka, Jack Squat.


7 posted on 03/08/2010 8:59:02 PM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

I think you’re right, if we haven’t all learned the story of “The Moderate Democrat”, it’s time we go back to school.

Still, Operation Chaos continues, having this guy out in the media telling the world how Chicago thug politcs works is a good thing. Just like the snake, know what he is before you get too close.


8 posted on 03/08/2010 9:00:07 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

““If the stories that are circulating are true about what really happened, the Republicans are going to hold up someone as the cause célèbre who harassed male members of his staff,” said a senior Democratic strategist. “Is that really where they want to be?”

What,wwit are they implying that there is something wrong with possibly being gay? That’s what I get from what they are implying.


9 posted on 03/08/2010 9:09:16 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Yep the more they are mired in denial the less time they have for healthcare!


10 posted on 03/08/2010 9:10:22 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Make no mistake: Rahm, Barack, Nancy and Harry love the media they are getting out of this. The other bozos on Capitol Hill — few of whom have skeleton-free closets — now all know what awaits them if they step out of line.

The choice is clear for those Dems whose contituents oppose ObamaCare — they can either risk defeat in November or be assured of disgrace now and defeat in November.


11 posted on 03/08/2010 9:14:47 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
He ain't my hero. Good riddance to another self-serving political creature.

I think it is way past time to hit the reset button and throw them all out and start over.

12 posted on 03/08/2010 9:15:17 PM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I heard a recording of him agreeing to sign on with The Progressive Caucus and joining them with killing the bill

HE AGREED TO VOTE AGAINST IT BECAUSE IT WASN"T FAR ENOUGH TO THE LEFT....BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE GOVERNMENT OPTION!

13 posted on 03/08/2010 9:16:05 PM PST by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Let’s see.....what’s that old saying that I’ve seen prolly 110 times on FR? Something about keeping your enemies close.....


14 posted on 03/08/2010 9:17:59 PM PST by abigailsmybaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

They’re all rats. I don’t want to befriend the guy and he isn’t a hero to me politico. But he is incredibly entertaining, reflects badly on the Democratic party and it’s not impossible one rat will turn on another if they see it to their benefit, Unsavory characters do it all the time. So...let’s see what he has to say ad if there is any truth to it. Fair is fair after Foley right? LOL


15 posted on 03/08/2010 9:18:19 PM PST by Soul Seeker (? for anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Massa should avoid high rises, elevators, parks, etc. and he should not start the car...


16 posted on 03/08/2010 9:28:12 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I know nothing about Massa’s politics, but respect that fact that he is the only Dem in Congress that says what the others are too afraid to - that Rahm is a sophmoric creep that has no business being on the public payroll. My question is why don’t the other Dems in Congress have the sense of responsibility to call out Rahm on his B.S. and instead, just passively just take orders from the White House when they should be taking orders from the citizens of their district?


17 posted on 03/08/2010 9:28:35 PM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Since when is popping a bowl of popcorn and pulling up a comfy chair to sit and watch a ‘progressive’ catfight making some libtard “our hero”?

If he turns out to be a liar, he goes back under the bus we drug him out from. I don’t think anyone has made him the offer to switch parties, have they?


18 posted on 03/08/2010 9:31:25 PM PST by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I find it hard to believe that the guy was so drunk that he would risk his career, marriage and reputation by being serious in the remark he made to his staffer. Had he cornered him in a coat room or something a put some moves on him, that would be entirely different. But, to say what he said, at a party in front of the entire staff.......nah...
I just don't understand why the dude resigned. AND I STILL WANT TO KNOW IF HE CAN WITHDRAW HIS RESIGNATION.
19 posted on 03/08/2010 9:53:45 PM PST by no dems (Palin / Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

I don’t think that “highly” of Rahm.


20 posted on 03/08/2010 10:21:37 PM PST by rbbeachkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson