Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbynack
When I was working on my Masters in Education in 2002, some of the students were trying to do a thesis that supported their hypothesis that there was a correlation between educational spending and student achievement. They were unable to find any studies that supported it.

I think that's rather well known (but we're not supposed to talk about it). There is no correlation between education funding, and educational outcome.

The money benefits employees, but has no effect on students. So, why do schools exist? To benefit employees? Or students?

(The answer is: to benefit employees.)

27 posted on 03/08/2010 8:32:12 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Jerry Pournelle (the science fiction writer) did research on predicting which students would do well in college base on their high school.

It was an honest study. The results were so “sensitive” that they gave him a degree, even though no publication dared to print the results. Turns out that some of the most highly touted suburban schools turn out students who are unprepared for college. If you didn’t live in the area and compare the schools, the variance between supposedly equal schools (by cost-per student, race, income of parents, etc.) is astounding.

The top 5% of schools (government, private, parochial) are amazing. The bottom half are appalling, and in the bottom 20%, the parents would be better off paying for an arsonist so the kids would be somewhere else.


51 posted on 03/08/2010 9:01:02 AM PST by bIlluminati (Don't just hope for change, work for change in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson