To: Kaslin
The basic premise is flawed. What was used was undercover journalism, not Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals.
2 posted on
03/07/2010 12:29:50 PM PST by
highlander_UW
(Obama has lost or not saved over 4 million jobs!)
To: highlander_UW
Needless destruction of people is wrong. Exposing them for what they really are is fine in my book.
6 posted on
03/07/2010 12:36:22 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin!)
To: highlander_UW
Even so - yes, Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals is to be used against the leftists at every possible opportunity, at maximum force and effectiveness.
10 posted on
03/07/2010 12:44:06 PM PST by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: highlander_UW
I have not read Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals. However, I have read a 20 page autobio downloaded from the internet. What a despicable character!
If only he had not abandoned his religion and done something useful with his life, instead of exploiting human resentment to satisfy his own ego.
Maybe he did some good in his life, but I can't see it.
To: highlander_UW
I have not read Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals. However, I have read a 20 page autobio downloaded from the internet. What a despicable character!
If only he had not abandoned his religion and done something useful with his life, instead of exploiting human resentment to satisfy his own ego.
Maybe he did some good in his life, but I can't see it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson