Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: The odds of a government health-care takeover--Public funding for abortion stands...
The Washington Times ^ | March 7, 2010 | Editorial

Posted on 03/07/2010 11:56:41 AM PST by jazusamo

Democrats are using the nuclear option to try to ram their government takeover of health care through the Senate. The fate of that legislation may come down to a dozen or so members of the House of Representatives opposed to government-funded abortions. Right now, the vote in the House couldn't be more closely divided.

The original version of the bill passed the House in November by a narrow 220 to 215 margin. Since then, three Democratic supporters have left Congress through retirement or death. A fourth, Rep. Eric Massa, New York Democrat, is reportedly resigning today because of charges that he sexually harassed a junior male staffer. The lone Republican who supported the bill has seen the light and switched his vote. All told, if no one else switches votes, the vote count stands at215 in favor and 216 against.

~snip~

In the meantime, Rep. Jim Matheson, Utah Democrat, switched from being against the bill to undecided. But don't worry, the congressman and the White House assure us that Mr. Matheson's flip-flop has nothing to do with the almost simultaneous announcement that President Obama was nominating Mr. Matheson's brother to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; cultureofcorruption; healthcare; matheson; obama; obamacare; pelosi; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: jazusamo
You're right, the corruption is not confined to one party. Nor is it confined to only one house, Reid and Pelosi are equally guilty. It's time to end a system in which unscupulous men can personally profit by selling their votes.

Can a few men stand up and say "I'm changing my position. I'm not undecided, I'm just not gonna tell you how I'm voting. And a lot of my peers aren't telling either.

And those who still want to work under the old system, I'm saying: That's not possible any more. Vote your conscience, not your wallet. Do what's right for YOUR COUNTRY."

21 posted on 03/07/2010 1:46:50 PM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

well, people have gone to war for less. The next few years are really going to be a challenge if this passes and it isn’t going to be pleasant at all I fear. Conservatives should have gotten off their rears a long time ago and I include myself in that. Thank goodness for the tea party that has enough guts to get people together in a grass roots effort. I never thought I would see the day when my neighbors would be called unamerican


22 posted on 03/07/2010 1:52:01 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mel

Amen to that, I couldn’t agree more. Your comment on the tea parties is right on. They’ve not only brought people together that are active but it’s gotten people active that were just sitting by and watching. The libs are scared of the movement and will do most anything to impede it.

It really is sad when a fairly large part of the population are only out to get what they can from the government and rely on that government to take care of them. It will be a tough hill to climb to get those people back on the productive side of things, tough but not impossible.


23 posted on 03/07/2010 3:01:57 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They may not be able to reverse it on the face of it. But, come 2015 or so, no one will be able to find a way to pay for it, and every other entitlement without monetizing our growing debt. What then, is the end game?

There will be a culmination of what we are seeing the beginning of now - a revolt against the overwhelming tax burden of the federal government that outweighs the benefits; against the loss of freedom that outweighs the security. When that happens the government will be forced to begin shedding it accumulated prized possessions. Forced to choose between Social Security, Medicare and Obamacare, what do you think will be chosen first?


24 posted on 03/07/2010 3:43:28 PM PST by omni-scientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Abortion is just a diversion to take focus off of the real reason that government control of health care must not happen.

Correct. Defeat Obamacare, and the whole question goes away, of forcing conscientious Christian doctors and church-run hospitals to perform, and Christian voters to fund, government-"approved" abortions.

As people like Mona Charen keep pointing out, government control of healthcare delivery, either directly or through control of payments, is "ball game".

25 posted on 03/08/2010 3:37:00 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
The ironic thing is that if the Democrats had listened to Ben Nelson, instead of buying him off, the Stupak amendment would be part of the Senate bill, and this whole thing would be a done deal.

That's because they're a) ideologues and b) totalitarian ideologues. The thing has to be just right, and 100% to their specification. Their eggs have to be over medium, not over easy, and they have to have four eggs not three or two -- and toast. There must be toast.

Americans aren't really amenable to that kind of thinking, but they're trying to train their 'Rat swarms to think like Eastern Europeans 30 years ago.

26 posted on 03/08/2010 3:42:42 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: omni-scientist
But, come 2015 or so, no one will be able to find a way to pay for it, and every other entitlement without monetizing our growing debt. What then, is the end game?

They're deliberately creating fiscal straits, as a peg for tighter controls and more demands.

27 posted on 03/08/2010 3:44:53 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson